Wiesenthal Centre to combat bullying of Jews

Growing harassment of Jewish students on college campuses across Britain, the US and Canada has prompted the Simon Wiesenthal Center to announce plans for an international effort to counter the phenomenon.

The whole idea of the campaign is "to debunk the mythology of the anti-Israel forces," Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the center's associate dean, told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday.

The campaign will include a so-called "iCAN" ad to run in student newspapers during this year's Israel Apartheid Week (which starts on Sunday), in which protesters worldwide will attempt to compare the Jewish state with the former racist regime in South Africa.

The ad, which features two aluminum cans connected together by a string, asks where modern society would be if it boycotted Israeli technology.

"Committed to boycotting Israel?" the ad asks. "Be Zion-free - do not use cellphones, voicemail, AIM and ICQ instant messaging, Google (which runs on Israeli algorithms), Microsoft Windows XP, Vista, Microsoft Office, Intel microchip, Pentium chip and microprocessor, and firewalls and virus protection software."

The ad goes on to relate that all of the items were developed in Israel, and implies that those who wish to go ahead with a boycott, should understand exactly what that entails.

The ad is part of a wider campaign to counter hostile events that have taken place on college campuses with increasing frequency and severity in recent months, especially since the IDF's Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip.

Recent incidents on college campuses in Canada - most notably a near-riot at York University in Toronto in which Jewish students were besieged in the school's Hillel house - are among the reasons for heightened concern, along with other anti-Israel efforts, including calls to boycott Israeli academia and products.

Earlier this week, B'nai B'rith Canada sent a letter to the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police regarding "the inadequate policing of university campuses, which have become breeding grounds for promoting hatred against Jewish students," and decrying "clear and emerging patterns of support for radicalism, civil disobedience, and ultimately violence, on university campuses."

California schools have also been hotbeds of anti-Israel and anti-Semitic activities in recent years, including the University of California, Irvine, where anti-Israel activity has reached a fever pitch during previous Israel Apartheid Week events.

UCLA professor Dr. Judea Pearl, father of slain Wall Street Journal journalist Daniel Pearl, is slated to join the Wiesenthal Center's effort, and will attend a protest in Los Angeles on Friday with senior Simon Wiesenthal officials to denounce the increasing intimidation of pro-Israel students on California campuses and the demonization of Israel by academics.

"The Wiesenthal Center has received calls for help from Jewish students at prestigious universities in the UK, Canada, throughout the United States, and especially right here in the state of California," Cooper and Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder and dean of the Wiesenthal Center, said in a statement. "The intensity of these incidents has escalated since Israel's incursion into Gaza to stop Hamas's relentless rocket barrage against its civilians."

"In addition to meeting with chancellors, presidents of universities and law enforcement, with this ad, we are launching a major effort to expose the hypocrisy of all who hide behind the facade of academia to target one country and one country only - Israel - for vilification," the Wiesenthal Center said.

The iCan ad is scheduled to run in student newspapers across the UK and North America, including York University, the University of Toronto, Columbia University, the University of Chicago, UCLA, UC Berkeley, UC Irvine, San Jose State and San Francisco State.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1235410729995&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Germany may arrest Holocaust row bishop

Jewish persecution of Christians continues

Germany is considering issuing an arrest warrant for Bishop Richard Williamson over his controversial claim that no Jews died in the gas chambers during the Second World War.

The 69-year-old British-born bishop made the comments during an interview with Swedish television last year at a seminary for the ultra-orthodox Society of Saint Pius X in the Bavarian village of Zaitzkoven, near Munich.

Under German law denial of the Holocaust is illegal and an investigation was launched by prosecutors after the interview was broadcast last month.

Germany's Justice Minister, Brigitte Zypries, confirmed yesterday that officials were considering issuing a European Union-wide arrest warrant for Dr Williamson, who flew into Britain earlier this week after being expelled from the Argentine seminary where he had been living for much of the past five years.

Mrs Zypries said that if an arrest warrant is issued, Britain would be obligated to arrest the renegade cleric and extradite him to Germany under a European set of guidelines introduced last year to toughen up anti-racism and hate crime laws. Although Britain has no specific laws against denying genocides, in Germany Holocaust denial is punishable with up to three years in prison and because the comments were made in Germany, Dr Williamson may be liable for prosecution.

The news of the arrest warrant came as the controversial bishop's attempted rehabilitation into the Catholic Church took a tumble when the Vatican rejected an apology he made earlier this week. After weeks of refusing an order from Rome to repent his Holocaust denial views "in an absolutely unequivocal and public way", he made a carefully worded apology on Thursday evening on the SSPX website.

In the statement, the bishop said his views on the Holocaust were that of a "non-historian ... formed 20 years ago on the basis of evidence then available, and rarely expressed in public since".

He added: "To all souls that took honest scandal from what I said, before God I apologise."

The Vatican's chief spokesperson, Father Frederico Lombardi, said Dr Williamson's apology "does not seem to respect the conditions" for his re-admission to the church.

Jewish and Holocaust-remembrance groups also rejected the apology saying Dr Williamson had failed to fully renounce his belief that the Holocaust has been exaggerated by historians. Rabbi Marvin Hier, the founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, said: "The one thing he doesn't say, and the main thing, is that the Holocaust occurred ... You want to make an apology, you have to affirm the Holocaust."

Karen Pollack, the chief executive of The Holocaust Educational Trust, also criticised the apology: "You don't need to be a historian to recognise one of the most defining episodes of the 20th century, where millions of Jews and others were brutally murdered by the Nazis. Williamson may have acknowledged the offence he has caused but the fact remains that he denied the Holocaust – even questioning the existence of gas chambers only a month ago. Holocaust denial is anti-Semitism under whatever guise."

Although the bishop belongs to a breakway Catholic sect that is not in full communion with the Catholic Church, the Vatican has been deeply embarrassed by Williamson's views because it lifted an excommunication order on the SSPX just days after his Holocaust denial interview was broadcast.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/germany-may-arrest-holocaust-row-bishop-1634379.html

Jewish Leaders Blast Clinton Over Israel Criticism

Zuckerman, Lawmakers, Local Jews Say Secretary Of State Not The Hillary Clinton They Used To Know: Hillary Pressuring Israel To Speed Up Aid To Gaza.

In a swift about face from her views as New York's senator, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is now hammering Israel over its treatment of Palestinians in Gaza.

As First Lady, Clinton raised eyebrows when she kissed Suha Arafat. Since she was then seeking a Senate seat the resulting brouhaha caused her to "re-think" her positions.

"I'm a very strong supporter of Israel," Clinton said back in February 2000.

On Thursday, as Secretary of State she had yet another about face in the form of angry messages demanding Israel speed up aid to Gaza. Jewish leaders are furious.

"I am very surprised, frankly, at this statement from the United States government and from the secretary of state," said Mortimer Zuckerman, publisher of the New York Daily News and member of the NYC Jewish Community Relations Council.

"I liked her a lot more as a senator from New York," Assemblyman Dov Hikind, D-Brooklyn, said. "Now, I wonder as I used to wonder who the real Hillary Clinton is."

Clinton's decision to hammer Israel comes as the Clintons and President Barack Obama are planning to give the Palestinians $900 million toward the rebuilding of Gaza in the wake of the Israeli offensive that was sparked by Hamas rocket fire.

"We are working across the government to see what our approach will be," Clinton said.

"I don't believe that we should be in a position at this point to do anything to strengthen Hamas," Zuckerman said. "We surely know what Hamas stands for as I say they are the forward battalions of Iran."

For some, Clinton's change of position is upsetting.

"I feel it's unfortunate that they don't continue the policy of the Bush administration, which was much more pro-Israel," said Akiva Homnick of Jerusalem.

"I happen to have a lot of family who live in Israel and I feel, personally, when you are dealing with people who are very strong against you, you have to stand up to them," said Tami Davudoff of Kew Gardens.

"Hillary had Mrs. Arafat here and she invited Mrs. Arafat for lunch when she was the first lady," added Babak Chafe of Great Neck. "She is pro-Palestinian 100 percent, really. Of course, we always knew it."

"The easy way to make a peace agreement is to pressure Israel because you can't pressure the Arabs," said Solomon Loewi of Monsey, N.Y.

All this could lead to a chilly reception when Mrs. Clinton arrives in the Middle East next week.

The new U.S. envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, arrived in Israel on Thursday with a mission to inject new life into peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians.

http://wcbstv.com/national/hillary.clinton.israel.2.945238.html

Jews Drool Over Mahler's Arrest, Sentence

Leftist-turned-neo-Nazi (Rub it in) jailed for denying Holocaust

A former extreme left-wing guerrilla turned neo-Nazi was sentenced to six years in prison Wednesday for calling the Holocaust "the biggest lie in history", a court said.
Horst Mahler, who in the 1970s co-founded the militant far-left Red Army Faction (RAF) and later swung violently far-right, was convicted of inciting racial hatred by the higher regional court in the southern city of Munich.

The now 73-year-old on several occasions vehemently disputed the Nazis had systematically exterminated six million European Jews during World War II.

Denying the Holocaust is a crime in Germany.

Mahler was also found to have sent offensive CD-ROMs and a book by convicted Holocaust denier Germar Rudolf through the mail.

"I expect to be and am counting on being brought before a court for my efforts and that I will be sentenced," Mahler wrote in a note sent with the packages, adding that the recipients would likely be called to testify.

The court said the only mitigating factor in Mahler's case was his advanced age.

"Adding to the severity of his sentence were the defendant's unreasonable and intransigent stance as well as the public attention he intentionally drew to his behaviour," the court said in a statement.

Mahler, who was immediately taken into custody, has a string of convictions for similar offences as well as for crimes dating back to his time with the RAF, which carried out a bloody campaign against the West German government.

Last April, he was convicted for giving a Hitler salute to a Jewish journalist in an interview and denying the Holocaust.

He has also praised the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States and has accused Jews of seeking "world domination".

http://www.ejpress.org/article/34999

Jewish groups reject Holocaust-doubting bishop's apology

Bishop Richard Williamson, whose readmission to the Catholic church caused an international outcry, last night apologised for remarks in which he denied the scale of the Nazi Holocaust.

In a statement on the website of the Rome Catholic news agency Zenit, he said his views on the Holocaust were not those of an historian. They had been "formed 20 years ago on the basis of evidence then available, and rarely expressed in public since." Williamson added: "To all souls that took honest scandal from what I said, before God I apologise."

He caused outrage by saying in a TV interview broadcast in January that there were no gas chambers in the Nazis' ­concentration camps. He also ­challenged the widely accepted figure of six million victims, saying he believed that no more than 300,000 Jews had died.

"I can truthfully say I regret ­having made such remarks, and that if I had known beforehand the full harm and hurt to which they would give rise, especially to the Church, but also to survivors and relatives of victims of injustice under the Third Reich, I would not have made them," Williamson said.

Some Jewish groups expressed disappointment at his statement. Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, said it was "not the kind of an apology that would end this matter" because it failed to address the central issue.

"The one thing he doesn't say, and the main thing, is that the Holocaust occurred, that it is not a fabrication, that it is not a lie," Hier said in a telephone interview. "You want to make an apology, you have to affirm the Holocaust."

Renzo Gattegna, the president of Italy's Jewish Communities, described the apology as "absolutely ambiguous."

The bishop belongs to an ultra-conservative Catholic breakaway movement, the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), and was expelled from the church after being ordained in an unauthorised ceremony in 1988. Last month Pope Benedict lifted his excommunication and those of three other SSPX bishops as a first step towards healing the church's only contemporary schism.

The move caused fury among Jewish leaders and indeed many Catholics, especially in Germany and Austria. It has led to widespread questioning within the church of Benedict's judgment and the way he reaches his decisions.

Zenit said Williamson's comments were released by the Vatican's Ecclesia Dei commission, a body set up by the late Pope John Paul II to try to heal the rift with the SSPX, which broke with the church over liberal reforms enacted in the 1960s.

In a passage hinting at pressure brought to bear on him, the bishop said "the events of recent weeks and the advice of senior members of the SSPX have persuaded me of my responsibility for much distress caused".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/feb/27/holocaust-denying-bishop-richard-williamson-apology-rejected

U.K. diplomat suspended for alleged anti-Semitic rant

A British official says a U.K. diplomat has been suspended following his arrest for an alleged anti-Semitic rant in a London gym.

Foreign Office Minister Gillian Merron told members of Parliament on Friday that Rowan Laxton, 47, had been suspended from his job at the Foreign Office and will face disciplinary proceedings.

He was arrested last month on suspicion of threatening to stir up religious hatred, but has not been charged.

He allegedly used foul language and criticized Israel's conduct during the conflict in Gaza and allegedly made an offensive comment about Judaism. Merron says the police investigation continues.

Witnesses had told the British newspaper The Daily Mail that they heard Laxton shouting "f**king Israelis, f**king Jews," while watching a TV report of Israel Defense Forces operations in Gaza from the seat of an exercise bike.

He also reportedly shouted that IDF soldiers should be "wiped off the face of the Earth."

The Daily Mail said Laxton continued the tirade even after he was approached by other gym users.

A complaint was later filed to police and Laxton was arrested and charged with inciting religious hatred, which carries a maximum seven-year prison term. He was released on bail.

Laxton is in charge of the South Asia Group at the Foreign office, where he is in charge of United Kingdom diplomacy for the region, according to the Daily Mail. His boss, Foreign Secretary David Miliband, is Jewish.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1067497.html

Debating the Holocaust

'Debating the Holocaust' IS A NEW LOOK AT BOTH SIDES. NOW, THE TRUTH BEHIND THE HOLOCAUST DENIAL DEBATE

This is a book about the Holocaust, and about two competing views of that event. On the one hand we have the traditional, orthodox view: the six million Jewish casualties, the gas chambers, the cremation ovens and mass graves. Traditional historians have thousands of surviving witnesses and the weight of history on their side. On the other hand there is a small, renegade band of writers and researchers who refuse to accept large parts of this story. These revisionists, as they call themselves, present counter-evidence and ask tough questions. They are beginning to outline a new and different narrative.

Thus there has emerged something of a debate -- a debate of historic significance. This is no peripheral clash between two arcane schools of thought, regarding some obscure details of World War II. It is about history, of course, but it also speaks to fundamental issues of our time: freedom of speech and press, the operation of mass media, manipulation of public opinion, political and economic power structures, and the coercive abilities of the State. It is an astonishingly rancorous and controversial debate, with far-reaching implications.

There was no budget.
There was no plan.
There was no extermination order from Hitler.

Preeminent Holocaust expert Raul Hilberg said: "What began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. [These measures] were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus -- mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy."

Is this really a comprehensible explanation?

Key camps have all but vanished. So too the human remains. Material evidence is astonishingly absent. The alleged gassing procedure has serious, unanswered questions. And the famous "six million" number has an amazing history.
Revisionists claim that the public has been seriously misled by traditional historians. Are they right?

IF WE COULD BE MISTAKEN ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST, WHAT ELSE COULD WE BE WRONG ABOUT?

BOOK CONTENTS

Introduction

PART I – SITUATING THE HOLOCAUST DEBATE

Chapter 1: The Great Debate

• The Core of Revisionism
• Four Myths
• Who’s Who in the Debate

Chapter 2: Truth versus Lies

• The Traditional Story
• A Question of Evidence
• The Nuremberg Trials

Chapter 3: On the Origin, and Future, of the “Six Million”

• The Prescient Times
• Revisionist Death Figures
• World Jewish Population

Chapter 4: Breaking It Down: The Death Matrix

• The Hilberg Matrix
• Life (and Death) in the Ghettos

PART II – DEATH CAMPS IN FOCUS

Chapter 5: Chelmno and the Nazi Camp System

• The Alleged Onset of Mass Murder—and the Missing Hitler Order
• Gas Chambers Galore
• Death Camp Chelmno
• Disposing of the Bodies
• Traditionalist Replies

Chapter 6: The Reinhardt Camps (I): Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka

• Estimated Fatalities
• The Death Matrices
• Electrocution, Steam, Diesels, Chlorine…

Chapter 7: Reinhardt (II): The Diesel Story

• Gerstein, Reder, and the Diesel Exhaust
• Traditionalist Replies

Chapter 8: Reinhardt (III): The Vanishing Bodies

• Excavations (Part I)—Belzec: The Polish Excavations of 1997–1999
• Excavations (Part II)—Treblinka: Soviet-Polish Diggings of 1944 and 1945
• Excavations (Part III)—Sobibor: 2001–2008
• Burying the Bodies
• Exhuming and Burning
• Traditionalist Replies
• Revisionist Death Estimates
• The End of the Line

Chapter 9: Majdanek

• The Death Matrix
• The Seven Chambers of Majdanek

Chapter 10: Auschwitz

• The Essentials of the Auschwitz Story—The Main Camp
• Birkenau—Alleged Extermination Camp
• Estimated Fatalities
• The Death Matrix
• Death Matrix (Part I): The Gas Chambers
• The Mechanics of Gassing
• No Holes?
• The Leuchter Report
• Death Matrix (Part II): Body Disposal
• Ovens and Capacity
• The Hungarian Operation
• Air Photo Evidence
• A Revisionist Auschwitz

PART III – THE FUTURE OF THE DEBATE

Chapter 11: “Storytellers Supreme”

• The Problem of the Witnesses
• Moving Ahead: A Revisionist Holocaust

Chapter 12: Hoax? Fraud? Conspiracy?

• A “Jewish Conspiracy”?
• Covering All the Bases
• Exploiting the Holocaust

Epilogue

Appendix A: Calculation Assumptions

Appendix B: Major Death Camp Witnesses—Pro and Con

Bibliography

General Index

More infos

Canada schools blasted for ban on anti-Israel 'apartheid' poster

Two Canadian universities came under criticism this week for banning a poster which is seen to be depicting Israelis as child-killers and accusing Israel of apartheid. Brazilian politicians and scholars, meanwhile, lambasted a recent student exchange accord between Tel Aviv University and a Catholic academy from Sao Paulo.

The posters from Canada, which were banned from Ottawa University and Carleton University, are advertisements for an annual series of events labeled as "Israeli Apartheid Week," due to begin on Monday, March 1. The "Israeli Apartheid Week" tradition began in 2005 in Toronto, spreading since to other campuses and cities.

The poster, circulated by pro-Palestinian activists, depicts a gunship with the word "Israel" on it firing a missile at a boy wearing a kaffiyeh and holding a teddy bear. In explaining the ban, Ottawa University said: "All posters approved must promote a campus culture where all members of the community can play a part in a declaration of human rights."

The poster has roused controversy in Canadian and international press and on campuses, where supporters of Israel said it was unacceptably portraying Israelis as child-killers - an old anti-Semitic theme.

One student from the Ottawa university, who preferred their names be withheld from this article, told Haaretz that the decision to ban the posters was "a blatant violation of free expression for students speaking out on human rights."

Activists also circulated letters and emails with phone numbers for the universities' directors, urging students to call and protest. Pro-Palestinian activist Jessica Carpinone argued that Carleton officials have given "no valid reason for banning the poster other than that it's a controversial issue."

B'nai Brith Canada executive vice-president Frank Dimant praised the universities' action but said the colleges should ban the week's entire "hate fest."

"Israel should be treated as an apartheid state"

Commenting on the student exchange agreement between the Brazilian university and Tel Aviv University, Valter Pomar, foreign relations secretary for Brazil's ruling party, the PT, told Haaretz that "now is not the time for such accords."

The accord was the first signing of a cooperation initiative between a Brazilian and an Israeli university since Israel's operation in Gaza.

Pomar added: "It would be proper to apply to the Israeli government the same treatment that the apartheid government of South Africa had received," said Pomer, who stressed he was speaking in his private capacity and not for the party.

Last month, Pomar cosigned an official announcement by the party accusing Israel of "state terrorism" and comparing its actions in Gaza to Nazi blitzes.

Brazilian priest José Oscar Beozzo, a prominent theologian from Sao Paulo, also indicated his reservations about the exchange deal, citing "Israel's condemnable massacre in Gaza."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1067277.html

Poland seeks foreign donations to preserve Auschwitz facilities

Poland has appealed for international donations to preserve facilities and exhibits at the former Nazi death camp of Auschwitz where more than one (1? not 4.5?) million Jews perished during World War Two.

The Auschwitz site, near the city of Krakow in southern Poland, comprises 155 camp buildings, 300 ruined facilities and hundreds of thousands of personal belongings and documents scattered over more than 200 hectares.

In a letter obtained by Reuters on Friday, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said those running the Auschwitz-Birkenau state museum would set up a foundation to administer a special fund with a minimum capital of 120 million euro "Saving Auschwitz-Birkenau means saving the memory of millions who suffered and were bestially murdered. It is the responsibility and duty of entire Europe," Tusk said in a letter addressed to leaders of European and some other countries, especially those with a large Jewish diaspora.

The museum itself lacks the resources to check the progressive decay and deterioration of its facilities and objects, Tusk said in his letter, dated February 10 but not previously made public.

Jews from all over Europe perished in the gas chambers at the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp set up by the Nazis after Germany's conquest of Poland in 1939. Many others died of starvation, forced labor, disease and in medical experiments.

Poland founded a museum on the site, known as Oswiecim in Polish, after the war. Hundreds of thousands of people visit the museum every year, passing through the iron gate bearing the motto "Arbeit macht frei" (work makes free).

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1067492.html

Below is the scanned image of the Official Death Total report from the International Red Cross.

Brown signs declaration against anti-Semitism

LONDON (JTA) -- Britain’s prime minister became the first world leader to sign the London Declaration on combating anti-Semitism.

The measure was adopted last week in the British capital by 125 legislators from more than 40 countries at a coalition meeting to combat anti-Semitism.

On signing the declaration, Gordon Brown said, “So many of the principles it enshrines are already things we are doing here in Britain, and while I’m proud of the bold action Britain has taken to combat anti-Semitism such as improved reporting, prosecutions for anti-Semitic Internet hate and the funding of Holocaust education in schools, there is no room for complacency.

He noted that the Department for Communities and Local Government is organizing an event at Beth Shalom, the Holocaust Center, to look in detail at how the government can implement the declaration.

"I encourage other heads of government to become signatories to this historic agreement," Brown said. "Ttogether our renewed efforts can rid the world of this ancient virus."

The London Declaration called on legislators to “expose, challenge and isolate political actors who engage in hate against Jews and target the State of Israel as a Jewish collectivity.” It also calls on governments to “challenge any foreign leader, politician or public figure who denies, denigrates or trivializes the Holocaust and must encourage civil society to be vigilant to this phenomenon and to openly condemn it.”

The London Declaration also calls on the United Nations to” reaffirm its call for every member state to commit itself to the principles laid out in the Holocaust Remembrance initiative, including specific and targeted policies to eradicate Holocaust denial and trivialization.” It also calls for action on education for the public and the authorities.

http://jta.org/news/article/2009/02/25/1003266/brown-signs-declaration-against-anti-semitism

Jews Are Guilty of Anti-Gentilism, Aren't They ? It Has to Stop

As a Gentile, I believe I'm being subjected to Anti-Gentilism

As a result of suffering this persecution lifelong, I am traumatised and believe I'm deserving of compensaying for my pain and loss

Where do I lodge my claim .. Israel ?

My solicitors have said I should claim for 300 million dollars at minimum

My fellow Gentiles are being persecuted as we speak, in Israel, where, according to the jew-owned media, Christian clerics and Christians generally have been shoved, pushed, spat upon, abused and threatened by Gentile-Hating jews.

As a Gentile, I have been excluded from jew-only gatherings and have been persecuted by jew lawyers who have .. on behalf of their jewish clients ... caused me grievious financial loss, also traumatic emotional suffering.

My parents and siblings, too, have been persecuted by Gentile-Hating jews, not to mention all my ancestors who were ground under the jewish heel through ususry and through manipulation (financial and other) of lords, nobles and kings who ordered my ancestors to war and purged them via taxes.

The jews have claimed they are 'God's favourites' and that the world will be granted to them, thus depriving me of my place on earth and in Heaven.

I want compensation and I expect my government to create an official body dedicated to achieving justice for Gentiles and to seeking out and punishing all those guilty of Anti-Gentilism.

We must be constantly on our guard against Anti-Gentilism, in all its evil manifestations.

'We'll make a pastrami sandwich of them .. we'll insert a strip of Jewish settlements in between the Palestinians, and then another strip of Jewish settlements right across the West Bank, so that in 25 years time, neither the United Nations nor the United States, nobody, will be able to tear it apart. "(Ariel (Arik) Sharon, 1973)

http://engforum.pravda.ru/showthread.php?t=242606

ADL chief: Pope Bendedict's condemnation of Holocaust denial not enough

Abe Foxman, the head of the Anti-Defamation League, sought to temper the enthusiastic responses expressed by Jewish leaders following their meeting on Thursday with Pope Benedict XVI over the reinstatement of a bishop who denies the Holocaust.

"The problematic and controversial chapter of the church and the matter of Holocaust denial do not end with the pope's declaration condemning Holocaust denial," Foxman told Haaretz.

Foxman, who was present at the meeting in the Vatican, refused to echo the compliments which other Jewish leaders feted the pope over his forceful denunciations of Holocaust denial.

"A meeting between Jews and the pope is always an important, historic event," Foxman said. Yet, "as long as the church allows an anti-Semitic bishop who denies the Holocaust to continue in his post under the aegis of the church, this means that the church is saying one thing yet doing another."

Foxman, himself a Holocaust survivor, seeks to emphasize that he appreciates the pope's condemnation and his moving statements on his planned visit to Israel. Yet, in his words, "you cannot say that you are against anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial when you allow an anti-Semitic bishop and Holocaust denier to continue serving in the clergy."

"The church gave the bishop enough time to recant," Foxman said. "But he asked for forgiveness only from the pope and he said he is waiting for proof that indeed six million Jews were murdered in the Holocaust and the Nazis used gas chambers."

"Holocaust denial is a crime by law in key countries," Foxman said. "Only after the church recants from the rehabilitation and restores his prior standing as excommunicated can we say that the matter of the church and Holocaust denial has been solved."

The ADL is the largest Jewish organization active in the United States.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1064000.html

Another Anti Zionist Jewish Professor Fired

STATEMENT OF JOEL KOVEL REGARDING HIS TERMINATION BY BARD COLLEGE

Introduction

In January, 1988, I was appointed to the Alger Hiss Chair of Social Studies at Bard College. As this was a Presidential appointment outside the tenure system, I have served under a series of contracts. The last of these was half-time (one semester on, one off, with half salary and full benefits year-round), effective from July 1, 2004, to June 30, 2009. On February 7 I received a letter from Michèle Dominy, Dean of the College, informing me that my contract would not be renewed this July 1 and that I would be moved to emeritus status as of that day. She wrote that this decision was made by President Botstein, Executive Vice-President Papadimitriou and herself, in consultation with members of the Faculty Senate.

This document argues that this termination of service is prejudicial and motivated neither by intellectual nor pedagogic considerations, but by political values, principally stemming from differences between myself and the Bard administration on the issue of Zionism. There is of course much more to my years at Bard than this, including another controversial subject, my work on ecosocialism (The Enemy of Nature). However, the evidence shows a pattern of conflict over Zionism only too reminiscent of innumerable instances in this country in which critics of Israel have been made to pay, often with their careers, for speaking out. In this instance the process culminated in a deeply flawed evaluation process which was used to justify my termination from the faculty.

A brief chronology

• 2002. This was the first year I spoke out nationally about Zionism. In October, my article, "Zionism's Bad Conscience," appeared in Tikkun. Three or four weeks later, I was called into President Leon Botstein's office, to be told my Hiss Chair was being taken away. Botstein said that he had nothing to do with the decision, then gratuitously added that it had not been made because of what I had just published about Zionism, and hastened to tell me that his views were diametrically opposed to mine.

• 2003. In January I published a second article in Tikkun, "'Left-Anti-Semitism' and the Special Status of Israel," which argued for a One-State solution to the dilemmas posed by Zionism. A few weeks later, I received a phone call at home from Dean Dominy, who suggested, on behalf of Executive Vice-President Dimitri Papadimitriou, that perhaps it was time for me to retire from Bard. I declined. The result of this was an evaluation of my work and the inception, in 2004, of the current half-time contract as "Distinguished Professor."

• 2006. I finished a draft of Overcoming Zionism. In January, while I was on a Fellowship in South Africa, President Botstein conducted a concert on campus of the Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra, which he has directed since 2003. In a stunning departure from traditional concert practice, this began with the playing of the national anthems of the United States and Israel, after each of which the audience rose. Except for a handful of protestors, the event went unnoticed. I regarded it, however, as paradigmatic of the "special relationship" between the United States and Israel, one that has conduced to war in Iraq and massive human rights violations in Israel/Palestine. In December, I organized a public lecture at Bard (with Mazin Qumsiyeh) to call attention to this problem. Only one faculty person attended; the rest were students and community people; and the issue was never taken up on campus.

• 2007. Overcoming Zionism was now on the market, arguing for a One-State solution (and sharply criticizing, among others, Martin Peretz for a scurrilous op-ed piece against Rachel Corrie in the Los Angeles Times. Peretz is an official in AIPAC's foreign policy think-tank, and at the time a Bard Trustee—though this latter fact was not pointed out in the book). In August, Overcoming Zionism was attacked by a watchdog Zionist group, StandWithUs/Michigan, which succeeded in pressuring the book's United States distributor, the University of Michigan Press, to remove it from circulation. An extraordinary outpouring of support (650 letters to U of M) succeeded in reversing this frank episode of book-burning. I was disturbed, however, by the fact that, with the exception of two non-tenure track faculty, there was no support from Bard in response to this egregious violation of the speech rights of a professor. When I asked President Botstein in an email why this was so, he replied that he felt I was doing quite well at taking care of myself. This was irrelevant to the obligation of a college to protect its faculty from violation of their rights of free expression—all the more so, a college such as Bard with a carefully honed reputation as a bastion of academic freedom, and which indeed defines such freedom in its Faculty Handbook as a "right . . . to search for truth and understanding without interference and to disseminate his [sic] findings without intimidation."

• 2008. Despite some reservations by the faculty, I was able to teach a course on Zionism. In my view, and that of most of the students, it was carried off successfully. Concurrently with this, another evaluation of my work at Bard was underway. Unlike previous evaluations, in 1996 and 2003, this was unenthusiastic. It was cited by Dean Dominy as instrumental in the decision to let me go.

Irregularities in the Evaluation Process

The evaluation committee included Professor Bruce Chilton, along with Professors Mark Lambert and Kyle Gann. Professor Chilton is a member of the Social Studies division, a distinguished theologian, and the campus' Protestant chaplain. He is also active in Zionist circles, as chair of the Episcopal–Jewish Relations Committee in the Episcopal Diocese of New York, and a member of the Executive Committee of Christians for Fair Witness on the Middle East. In this capacity he campaigns vigorously against Protestant efforts to promote divestment and sanctions against the State of Israel. Professor Chilton is particularly antagonistic to the Palestinian liberation theology movement, Sabeel, and its leader, Rev. Naim Ateek, also an Episcopal. This places him on the other side of the divide from myself, who attended a Sabeel Conference in Birmingham, MI, in October, 2008, as an invited speaker, where I met Rev. Ateek, and expressed admiration for his position. It should also be observed that Professor Chilton was active this past January in supporting Israeli aggression in Gaza. He may be heard on a national radio program on WABC, "Religion on the Line," (January 11, 2009) arguing from the Doctrine of Just War and claiming that it is anti-Semitic to criticize Israel for human rights violations—this despite the fact that large numbers of Jews have been in the forefront of protesting Israeli crimes in Gaza.

Of course, Professor Chilton has the right to his opinion as an academic and a citizen. Nonetheless, the presence of such a voice on the committee whose conclusion was instrumental in the decision to remove me from the Bard faculty is highly dubious. Most definitely, Professor Chilton should have recused himself from this position. His failure to do so, combined with the fact that the decision as a whole was made in context of adversity between myself and the Bard administration, renders the process of my termination invalid as an instance of what the College's Faculty Handbook calls a procedure "designed to evaluate each faculty member fairly and in good faith."

I still strove to make my future at Bard the subject of reasonable negotiation. However, my efforts in this direction were rudely denied by Dean Dominy's curt and dismissive letter (at the urging, according to her, of Vice-President Papadimitriou), which plainly asserted that there was nothing to talk over and that I was being handed a fait accompli. In view of this I considered myself left with no other option than the release of this document.

On the responsibility of intellectuals More

Evil Zionism Is Destroying Civilzation

Zionist Fascist Germany is in a legal crisis because of enforcing the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah lie.

Mahler Gets 6 Years Over Holocaust Statement

MUNICH - German dissident Horst Mahler has been sentenced to six years in prison for "Volksverhetzung" (racial incitement). The symbolically significant number of years imposed for "anti- Semitic hate speech" stemmed from his refusal to recognize the Jewish Holocaust®, which he described as "the biggest lie in world history."

FACING LIFELONG IMPRISONMENT-Dissident Horst Mahler is seen here with his wife Sylvia Stolz, currently in prison for defending other dissidents.

The 73-year-old defendant was accused, among other things, of repeated dissemination of his views on the Internet as well as distribution of a revisionist videotape and a CD and book by Holo-skeptic Germar Rudolf, now serving time for "Holocaust® denial" in a German prison.

Immediately following sentencing, the 73-year-old dissident was arrested and led away before astonished onlookers in the courtroom, including many of his supporters.

The former attorney for the rightwing National Democratic Party (NPD) successfully represented that organization when the German regime tried to have it banned in the 1990s. He earlier received prison sentences for thought-crimes on several occasions.

'I have resolved to call a lie a lie'

In his concluding remarks before the court, Mahler noted that with another case pending against him he faces a total of over 12 years in prison - the equivalent of a life sentence, given his advanced age. He would, however, stand by his views.

In setting a personal example, Mahler declared that it was incumbent upon every German to "deal a deathblow to the Holocaust® religion as martyrs for the truth."

The dissident defendant concluded by saying:

"I have resolved to expose this Talmudic perfidy, that over and over again I will call a lie a lie and oppose it with the truth. I have sworn to my people never to give up in this fight against the Holocaust® religion." Rense.com

Official Records From International Red Cross PROVE "HOLOCAUST" Was a Fraud

About Hoaxes

Hoaxes are part of human history. For different reasons, at different times, some people have created a false event and have tried to convince others that it was a true event. Humans have believed unbelievable stories. Some hoaxes are funny and others are serious.

One famous hoax was about the Moon. In 1835, the New York Sun newspaper ran some stories that were supposedly reprinted from a non-existent science journal. These articles documented discoveries supposedly made by a real scientist, Sir John Herschel, from a new telescope in Africa. Sir John was actually in Africa at the time and was unable to read the stories that carried his name. The newspaper articles described Moon oceans, beaches, wild life and birds. One article had this immensely powerful telescope spotting 14 furry winged men! How big would a telescope have to be to sight individual beings on the Moon? It seems that questions did not pop into everyone's head! The story of men on the Moon was wildly popular. The Sun sold more newspapers that day than any other newspaper in the world. The articles continued to describe architecture and other details until the last installment claimed that the telescope had been left facing east and the Sun's rays had damaged the telescope beyond repair. Later, a Richard Locke confessed to writing the articles and the newspaper admitted it was a hoax. People were not angry; most people thought that it was funny and the Sun became an even more popular newspaper!

Another hoax has been called the grand science hoax of the century. In 1913, an amateur archeologist brought in some fragments of a human skull to the British museum. Remember, this was before the days of carbon dating. Found near an archeological site called Piltdown, this skull and jaw were soon known as "Piltdown Man". What made this find remarkable was that the skull had a huge brain cavity and a jawbone like an ape's -- but the teeth were worn down like a human's. This find was quickly locked away for safety. Unable to examine the evidence, scientists theorized that "Piltdown Man" proved that the human brain evolved first and then the rest of the body. In 1953, "Piltdown Man" was shown to be a forgery; the human skull was modern, the jaw belonged to an ape, and the teeth had been filed. The biggest mystery remaining around this hoax is: who did it? And why did they do it?

Some hoaxes have exploited myths. Loch Ness is a large lake in Scotland, and for years it was a quiet place. A photograph of a dinosaur-like creature with a long neck was published in 1934. This photo created a sensation -- promoting tourist visits and scientific expeditions that continue to this day. Sixty years later, one of the pranksters confessed that the photo had been created using a tiny homemade sea serpent and a toy submarine! The public reaction had been so great at the time of publication, that the pranksters had decided to keep quiet.

Some pranksters do strange things. For years, some wheat fields in England were mysteriously mowed in such a way as to suggest circles. Some people believed that the circles were alien messages, ancient symbols, or alien DNA. In 1991, two men admitted to mowing over 250 crop circles over the years. Why do you think they took the time and effort to make these crop circles?

Other hoaxes are more serious and frightening. In the middle ages, witch crazes in England and America resulted in witch hunts, witchcraft trials, and executions. Recently, one group says that Hitler did not kill 5 to 6 million Jews during World War II; they claim that Jews are making it up. They claim that the Jews are attempting to cultivate power through sympathy. Sadly, witches and Jews were killed.

What can we learn from hoaxes? We can learn the importance of consistently examining evidence and forming our own opinions. Look at the pictures yourself. Read the accounts by the witnesses. Evaluate the interpretations. Does it make sense? Is it logical? Is there consistency in the evidence? Are there any contradictions to the evidence? It is important that you draw your own conclusions. Always keep thinking! Source:Teacher Lesson Plans: Hoax Happens

The Hoax of the Twentieth Century
The Case Against The Presumed Extermination Of European Jewry

.

Holocaust Survivors Living Alone Have Credit Card on Their Side

Thousands of Holocaust survivors in the United States live alone, often at or near poverty. Since 1939, many of them have turned to The Blue Card for help. With the launch today of The Blue Card Visa affinity credit card, anyone can help The Blue Card provide personal emergency response systems (PERSYS) for Holocaust survivors living alone.

The Blue Card Visa affinity credit card goes live today at www.cardpartner.com/app/blue-card. The Blue Card organization earns $50 for each activated card. Then once each quarter for the life of the card, the organization earns a share of the monthly charge volume. By using the card for everyday spending, cardholders help The Blue Card purchase PERSYS units for Holocaust survivors. A PERSYS is an electronic device that summons help in an emergency situation.

“Many Holocaust survivors live alone and have no one who can come to their rescue in an emergency situation. With money raised by cardholders activating and using The Blue Card Visa affinity credit card, The Blue Card can meet the needs of more survivors and ensure that their dignity is preserved,” said Elie Rubinstein, Executive Director of The Blue Card.

The Blue Card offers The Blue Card Visa affinity credit card in cooperation with CardPartner (www.cardpartner.com), a New York-based company that helps non-profits of all sizes establish the kinds of affinity credit card programs once reserved for large groups. CardPartner operates in the virtual environment, strips out costs by offering free, customized self-service marketing tools, and works with groups like The Blue Card on a human scale not often seen in the credit card industry.

“CardPartner clients love how quickly their programs get started, the fact that they control the marketing, and that proceeds help fund their operations and not someone else’s overhead,” says Mark Levitt, CardPartner senior creative director.

About The Blue Card

The Blue Card (www.bluecardfund.org) is a New York-based national nonprofit whose mission is to provide direct financial assistance to needy Jewish survivors of Nazi persecution who are living in the United States. The Blue Card was established by the Jewish community in Germany in the early 1930s and was re-established in the United States in 1939 to continue aiding those resettling in America. More

British Government calls summit over rising anti-Semitism

Anti-Semitism has become such a problem that the Foreign Office welcomed nearly 100 legislators from 35 countries to a conference this week aimed at tackling the issue.


The inaugural conference of the Inter-parliamentary Coalition for Combating Anti-Semitism (ICCA) is the first of its kind to receive such prominent Government support. The two-day summit was held in the Houses of Parliament and at Lancaster House.

The Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, said: “Anti-Semitism has been with us for millennia, but has mutated in form and expression through the ages. Today it has adapted to new technologies and has no defined borders.

“The internet age, with its manifold benefits, has the downside that hate is able to travel faster and further than ever before. Modern and innovative solutions are essential if we are to combat this. So is international co-operation.”

Attacks on UK Jews increased following the Israeli offensive in Gaza in December.

Speaking at the event, Irwin Cotler, a former Attorney General of Canada, said: “What we are witnessing today – and which has been developing incrementally, sometimes imperceptibly, and even indulgently, for some 35 years now – is a new sophisticated, globalizing, virulent and even lethal anti-Semitism, reminiscent of the atmospherics of the 30s, and without parallel or precedent since the end of the Second World War.”

France’s Council of State took the opportunity to coincide their formal recognition of the countries role in deporting Jews to concentration camps. While the senior court admitted culpability beyond simple obedience of Nazi demands, they ruled out further reparations for the victims.

http://www.religiousintelligence.co.uk/news/?NewsID=3929

Ex-CEO of kosher slaughterhouse: Grand jury biased

Attorneys for the former CEO of the nation's largest kosher meatpacking plant say immigration, bank fraud and other charges against him should be dismissed because the grand jury that indicted him was biased against Jews.

Chabad committee formed to help Rubashkin defense

Sholom Rubashkin faces nearly 100 federal counts and is accused of helping illegal immigrants get fake documents so they could work at Agriprocessors Inc.'s slaughterhouse in Postville, Iowa.

On Monday, his attorney and an attorney for Agriprocessors asked U.S. District Judge Linda Reade to dismiss the charges against Rubashkin and the company.

The attorneys say the grand jury developed prejudices based on Jewish stereotypes.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean Berry says the indictment was based on evidence, not religion. AP

Feds: Drugs made at kosher meat plant
Sholom Rubashkin arrested, charged with conspiracy, fraud and identity theft; bail set at $1 mil

The Fall of the House of Rubashkin
Chabad committee formed to help Rubashkin defense
Jews Must Face 'Dark Side' Of Judaism

Out of the Overflow of the Heart–Jesus and Mary as Vulgar Comedy In The Holy Land

Considering the wailing-and-gnashing-of-teeth drama to which the entire world was recently subjected as a result of Bp Richard Williamson’s refusal to accept as gospel truth Jewish claims concerning that “sancta sanctorum” known as the Holocaust, one would assume that a television program featuring Jesus as a fat, balding, Jonathon Pollard look-alike and his mother Mary as a Sarah Silverman act-alike should have made headline news all around the world, not only for its outrage but as well for its obvious hypocrisy.

And indeed it would have made headline news and ESPECIALLY had the Picassos responsible for this masterpiece in anti-Christian vulgarity been Muslims. As luck would have it however the program in question was not the brainchild of Imams, jihadists, Iranian president Ahmadinejhad nor Osama Bin Laden. Nor did the highly-offensive program air in Iran, Syria, Pakistan or any other Muslim enclave said by Jewish interests to be devoted to Christianity’s “utter destruction”.

Rather, it aired in the country said to be–not only the headquarters of God himself but as well, Christianity’s bestest buddy in the whole wide world, Israel. In addition to polluting the air waves of the land made holy by the life and death of Jesus Christ, the said piece was also written, produced and directed by Jews who–claiming their typical divine right of kings–used it as an opportunity in defaming not only Jesus Christ but as well the woman held by 2.5 billion Christians and Muslims to be the purest woman ever created, His mother Mary.

Airing February 18^th on Israel’s Channel 10, a skit entitled “Like A Virgin” was run on popular late-night comedian Lior Shlein’s program to predictably raucous, rowdy applause. In addition to classical paintings of the Virgin Mary and Jesus, it also featured a line-up of sexual gratification devices said to have been used by the mother of Jesus along with a montage of other scenes characterizing her more like the foul-mouthed Hollywood Jewess Sarah Silverman than as the saintly woman revered and loved by Christians and Muslims. With the typically-insolent tone all-too-common these days among Jewish supremacists who know they have nothing to fear from an emasculated Christian world held prisoner by Jewish money, media and the threat of nuclear annihilation, Shlein the Swine’s shtick proceeded as follows–

“You hear every week someone new denying the holocaust, whether it is a Cardinal, patriarch, bishop, priest or some boy molested by the other members of the group, they deny it. Well, instead of getting mad I decided to get even and mention Christianity. Yes, I’m not kidding, they must be taught a lesson and this is what we are going to do now…”

“Tonight we’re going to mention some things the church has taught. Christians tell you that Mary the mother of Jesus was a virgin but this isn’t true…The proof of that is very simple–John the Baptist used to surprise her when he would put his 2 fingers near the top of her thigh and she never jumped or flinched. In addition to that, if she was really a virgin she would not have shown off her dildos every night when she was with Josephus Flavius…”

“The truth is that Mary got pregnant when she was 15 by her classroom boyfriend…Her parents wanted to put her in the convent, but since Jesus wasn’t born yet and there was no Christianity, there was no convent and so her parents left her in a soccer stadium where she spent a hot night in a hotel with the Canaan Club…”(?)

“Christians say that Jesus used to walk on water in the Sea of Galilee but this is not true. Jesus was very fat and too ashamed to leave the house in his swim suit and go to the sea of Galilee. Starting at the age of 3 he started eating sacred bread and wound up one of those fat boys. He spent all his life trying to lose weight and for him every supper was the last supper. He was always saying “On Sunday I will start my diet” which is why Sunday is a sacred day for Christians…”

Of course those not familiar with the typically Jewish business of dealing with the memory of Jesus as insolently as Israel’s forefathers dealt with Him violently, the obvious question is “Why?”. Why would they–the “light among nations” and “God’s chosen people” do such a thing when the golden rule these days is “tolerance” for other religions? In a day and age when so much effort has been put in convincing Christians of their duty in going and fighting the enemies of the Jewish state on the premise that Jews and Christians are “kissing cousins” why the “sudden betrayal”?

Well, the answer given by Shlein was simple–revenge, and in particular because certain ideas held sacred by God‘s chosen people concerning the particulars of what they consider to be the main pillar of Jewish religiosity (Jewish suffering that culminated in the Holocaust) had been “disrespected” weeks earlier with the skepticism of one Bp. Richard Williamson.

One can just imagine the resulting noise pollution to which the tired, fragile ears of humanity, sick of all the constant Jewish shrieking over “this and that” would have been subjected if instead of being a Jewish program blaspheming Jesus and Mary it was a Gentile program featuring the “Joan of Arc” of Holocaustianity–Anne Frank–as she displayed the kinds of sexual toys with which she pleasured herself when she was not busy hopping from bed to bed with Nazi guards. Likewise with any of the great patriarchs of the modern state of Israel such as Theodore Herzl being depicted as some lying, money-grubbing, syphlitic child-molester with lice running through his beard. Like some deadly plague sent by the Old Testament deity Yahweh, angry that His favorite people had been mistreated, a giant tidal wave of hissing, cursing and threats would erupt from the Jewish world from every corner with the same kind of madness as recently took place following the calm, measured comments of one Bp Richard Williamson who has learned by trial and error that the boy who cries wolf cannot be believed anymore.

As can be expected however, Jewish groups (yes, the very same ones constantly lecturing the rest of the non-Jewish world on moral issues such as ‘tolerance’ and ‘sensitivity’ for others’ beliefs) have had absolutely nothing to say concerning this most recent demonstration of the nastiest and most well-funded/well-organized form of “anti-Semitism” alive today–meaning the institutionalized hatred for Jesus Christ by Jewish interests. The ADL, dedicated to fighting ‘hate and bigotry’ and whose director Abe Foxman never misses an opportunity in getting his big beak in front of any tv camera he can find whenever someone dares delineate the organic hatred for all things Christian on the part of organized Jewish groups has been as silent as death on the matter. Likewise with all the other ‘High Priests’ of Jewish moralizing such as Eli Weisel et al. But then, why should anyone be surprised at this, since it was Abe Foxman himself who was nightly fare in the days and weeks leading up to the release of Mel Gibsons’s Passion of the Christ and who predicted a new holocaust was right around the corner if such a movie favorable to Jesus Christ were released for public viewing?

Thus far the only Christian entity (outside the Middle East itself) voicing even mild protest is the Vatican, which is said to be “irked” at the blasphemous depiction of Jesus and Mary. This from an organization whose influence over her flock at one time was so fearsome that presidents, prime ministers and princes dared not get sideways with the Bishop of Rome for fear of the power of his word. When considering the embarrassing, ridiculous lengths traversed by not only Pope Benedict XVI but the entire Vatican apparatus in trying to ameliorate the anger of worldwide Jewry over the comments of Bp Williamson, compared to the limp-wristed protest over the blaspheming of Christianity’s two most-important persons, it is obvious now that there is more worry over offending the Jews than there is over the disrespect shown to Jesus and His mother. All the other “heavy hitters’ out there, including but not limited to the infamous John Hagee, Pat Robertson, Rod Parsley et al have offered no condemnations over the skit and have refused to comment on it after being contacted by this reporter.

By contrast, Muslims worldwide are outraged over such blasphemous depictions. Organized groups throughout the entire world have reacted to this latest blasphemy with the same emotion as took place with the infamous cartoons published in Europe disrespectful to the prophet Mohammed. Hezbollah, which fought Israel in a 33 day war during the summer of 2006 and credited with driving Jewish forces out of Lebanon was the first organized entity to issue a statement condemning the program. In an interview with Iran’s Press TV, Hezbollah called it ‘a grave offense against a holy messenger of God’, adding that “It was not surprising to see the Zionists broadcasting such sacrilegious material, given their history, which is filled with the massacre of prophets, destruction of mosques and churches and offensive behavior toward Islamic and Christian sanctities.’ Truer words have never been spoken.

As already mentioned, the “inspiration” for this disgusting, grotesque display of raw Jewish hatred for the sanctity of Jesus and His mother is said to be an exercise in “tit-for-tat”, meaning revenge on the part of God’s chosen people whose collective nose was rubbed raw by the comments of one individual–Bp Williamson–and the refusal on the part of his boss–the Catholic Church–to burn him at the stake as the Jews demanded. What this displays is that the virtue of “turning the other cheek” obviously has no merit amongst those who live by the maxim “an eye for an eye” and who will hear nothing of “rising above it all”, but instead insist upon wallowing in the sewer of hatred and vengeance for all enemies of the Jewish state, real or contrived.

The fact is though that there is more to this recent event than simple revenge on the part of some sexually-obsessed degenerate Jewish comedian who wears his hair like Bozo the clown. And although of vital importance in the greater scheme of things. It is not likely to be brought up at the next AIPAC meeting when for-the-most-part Christians in America are fleeced of their economic and political power in feeding a beast that will likely one day devour them, literally as well as figuratively.

In the first case, whatever denouncements that may (stress, MAY) come from any organized Jewish groups (in addition to being affected and without any substance) will at the same time be tempered with the defense similar to the one used in perpetrating the most recent holocaust against the Palestinians (Christian and Muslim) in Gaza, namely that the offending program was just the natural outcome of all the “persecutions” endured by Jews at the hands of Christian anti-Semites for millions and millions and millions of years.

Secondly, what will be assiduously avoided is any discussion of the fact that the most recent blaspheming against Jesus and His mother was not an aberration or accident by any means. Nor will there be any talk of the fact that the particulars of the blasphemous statements made against them have a traceable, verifiable, predictable source, in this case the ultimate “book of hate” known as the Talmud, considered Judaism’s holiest book. Despite assertions by certain Jewish groups that it is but a “harmless collection” of opinions about various things as innocuous as what kind of literature a Jew is allowed to read while on the toilet, (or, in the case of the now-infamous rabbis of Neturei Karta that the Talmud is a book of “peace and love”) the truth is that the inspiration for such ideas featured on the recent Israeli program were lifted right out of its pages. Desperate to cast Judaism’s greatest nemesis in the worst possible light, within the pages of this work Jesus is referred to as a sorcerer and sexual deviant and his mother Mary as a prostitute who conceived Him while menstruating. Gloating over his death and the fact that it was the Jews who were responsible for causing it, it also consigns Jesus to an eternity in hell where He remains in a vat of boiling excrement for the unforgivable sin of opposing the rabbis of His day.

In short, would be a mistake for Christian supporters of Israel who have bought into the farcical notion that Jews and Christians are “mostly the same” to assume this latest outrage was an oddity of sorts. The only thing “odd” about it is that it does not happen with more frequency, given Judaism’s historic and organic hatred for all things Christian.

However (and particularly for those who underwent some sort of sick pleasure from this latest blasphemy) all can be rest assured it certainly will not be the last. As Israel becomes more sure of herself and more confident of the fact that she has the Christian world by the short hairs she will drop the mask bit by bit and reveal herself for what she truly is and always was–the institutionalization of anti-Christianity.

When once confronting His enemies, Jesus exclaimed that “out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks”, and with regards to this latest display of raw, distilled Jewish vulgarity for the persons of Jesus Christ and His mother (as well as the absence of any outrage on the part of the Jewish community over it) what all persons can rightly assume is that it is but the tip of an iceberg that remains carefully hidden below the waterline…for now.

In the meantime, Christians should come to grips with what is already known by the Muslim world in toto–that by its very nature there can be no ‘peaceful co-existence’ with a religion such as Judaism that holds all other religions with utter hostility. In the case of Jewish “respect” for other faiths (and in particular those of Christianity and Islam) it is a case of “kill or be killed” and the sooner Christians realize this fact the safer from defamation will be the persons of their faith they hold most dear.

(c) 2009 Mark Glenn

Correspondent, American Free Press Newspaper

www.americanfreepress.net

The Jews Killed Jesus: A Video Presentation

I made a short presentation which presents the proof that Christian and Jewish religious texts establish that the Jews murdered Jesus Christ:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOtv8ctcXQ4

Another copy appears here:

http://www.jewishracism.com/Jews-Killed-Jesus.wmv

When Will Real Americans Stand Up To The Zionist Power Configuration?

I don't think that the average American knows what has and continues to go on in the Middle East, let alone understands the threat posed by what Professor James Petras refers to as the Zionist Power Configuration. Because there is no likelihood that our mainstream news media will ever broach this topic, I have decided to present the circumstances that Palestinians face daily in a way that average Americans can understand. This hopefully will create empathy for the worlds real Semites and the descendants of Jesus, the Palestinians.

Red Hatfield, Jr. (pictured above) is a proud American engaged in the transportation business. Red resides with his lovely wife Clementine, his grade school sweet heart, on forty acres in Hazard County Kentucky. Red inherited the property from his father Red Sr. after he died prematurely due to cross complications from liver and venereal diseases. Red is also very proud of his two sons, Red III and William Robert who unlike he went on to receive advanced degrees from Hazard Junior High School. Red III is now one of the top distributors of pharmaceuticals in State of Kentucky. His top product of course Oxycontin(Hillbilly Heroin). Billy Bob is the assistant manager of the Blue Grass Bait Shop and is one of Red III's best customers according to Red III.

Until recently Red Jr. had been living the American dream. He was the envy of Hazard County with his double wide trailer. Red earned almost $40,000 each year at his job with Yellow Freight. In addition, he had accumulated over $150,000(now worth about $35,000) in his 401k . Red of course could have reached the pinnacle of his profession, chief dispatch operator at Yellow, but declined this opportunity many times over his career. No desk job for Red, he felt that he belonged to the highway. Red was also well aware that those hardwoods on his forty acres were coming into there prime. The value of the white oak alone could carry he and Clementine well into their old age. Red was relying heavily on this stumpage for his retirement.

But something horrible was happening in Hazard while Red and the other citizens of Hazard County were a sleep at the wheel. Capitalizing on Indian holocaust sympathies as well as generous political contributions from their many casino holdings, a group of diasporad Punkapog Indians "Special Praying Indians" received a land grant from Congress for a tract of land in Kentucky already inhabited called Hazard County. Although Congress intended that the Punkapogs share the land with its indigenous inhabitants, the Punkapogs were not sharing kind of people. The clanish Punkapogs had long frowned upon inter tribal assimilation and immediately declared war on the indigenous inhabitants of Hazard driving many from their homes in what was called the Hazard County Nakba. To add insult to injury the Punkapogs who were originally from Massachusetts claimed an ancestral right to the land in Kentucky because many years ago their forefathers converted to the religion of the Yuchi, an Indian tribe actually indigenous to Kentucky. Now most Punkapogs simply refer to themselves as Yues. The Yues now claim that biscuits and gravy was a product of their Yueish culture.

And now the problem is on Red Jr.'s door step. Weaponized IOF Caterpillar tractors are now clearing Red's back forty for new Yueish settlements. Down came the olive...I mean white oaks and other hardwoods that Red was counting on. Just last week while on the road Red's home was invaded by the IOF (Indian Occupation Forces). Because Red's double wide sits on the top of a hill over looking the countryside it provides the perfect vantage point for the IOF to watch for Hazard militants out to defeat their Yueish occupiers. Red is still outraged over the last time his home was occupied. The IOF stold his Grandfather's banjo and vandalized his special Dale Earnhardt memorial he kept in his spare bedroom(it used to be an Elvis memorial but Red is a progressive Kentuckian and thought it was time to move on) over turning candles and defacing Dale's pictures and other collectibles. These IOF bastards even urinated in his tobacco spittoon and defecated on his shag carpeting as a show of disrespect for he and his people. Clementine still trembles each time she tells Red how disrespectful the Yues had been to her. More

31.5 million Hungry Americans

Israel and the ‘Exodus’ Of America’s Wealth
Bush's Zionist War Caused The US Financial Crisis

America's Top 15 Booming Cities now Empty

Money's tight, baby. City's in trouble. State's deep in the hole. Nation's broke.

American Jewry and The Economic Crisis

“OPEN THE FLOOD GATES FOR IMMIGRATION,” declared the Jew, Senator Jacob Javits of New York, in his and the Jewish Lobby’s promotion of the Immigration Law of 1965. In plain terms, Javits & US Jewry were declaring war on America’s dispossessed majority, white Christian Americans.

American Jewry, a highly organized, intensely ethnocentric & abominably wealthy minority, is hell bent on ruling over a pummeled and guilt-ridden white majority.

Jewry accomplishes this by diluting and fragmenting the white Christian population through ‘multiculturalism’ vis-a-vis acts of Congress and the Jewish-run mass media. Jews fear and will do anything in their power, (and they now have all the power in America), to eradicate any semblance of nationalism emanating from white Christian Americans.

“Diversity Is Our Strength!” is the Jewish-conceived media/law-making campaign of Jewry’s beloved pluralistic society, yet another Jewish-inspired agenda for an America society expunged of a white Christian dominating presence.

But while “diverse” Americans, whether naturalized or illegal immigrants, are now competing with American born whites in the job market, it is the Jews, and the Jews only, who grow stronger in such a scenario, while diverse groups grow economically and politically weaker and serve only to dilute any opposition to Jewish-Zionist hegemony.

In his classic work, The Dispossessed Majority, Wilmot Robertson points out that since the Anti-Semitic taboo has made it impossible to submit the Jewish question to open inquiry, Jews have set themselves above the rules of conventional democratic conduct.

Robertson’s parting shot to the Jewish minority is his profound observation that “the most truly disadvantaged are those who are hated for their virtues not their vices, who insist on playing the game of life with opponents who have long ago abandoned the rules.”

Having grown up as a Jew in an upper middle class synagogue, I can attest from my experiences within Jewry, that there is only one “rule” that Jews subscribe to. And this rule is faithfully observed by Jews under a question they ask themselves regarding all American issues: “Is it good for the Jews?” But Jews never ask, “Is it good for America?”

Take for instance the concept of the immigration dream of an American “melting pot.” This slogan was put forth by the Jew, Israel Zangwill, in his 1909 book, From The Ghetto To The Melting Pot.

Though Jews will tout the “melting pot” idea to the highest heavens, they themselves do not want to “melt.” Jews would rather die than live in a black suburban neighborhood. Rather, the Jews are intent on retaining their ethnocentric identity in their own wealthy neighborhoods and they use this identity to present themselves, (though abominably wealthy), as a “persecuted” racial group.

The current economic crisis is a two-edged sword for American Jewry. On the one hand, Jews fear that an economic downturn will provoke a backlash against them for being responsible for the crisis. This fear was justified recently in a November 2008 poll which showed that 31% of Europeans blame Jews for the global financial crisis.

But on the other hand, an economic crisis coupled with a rising military state under the Zionist puppet-president, Barack Obama, ensures that Jews will be protected from a civil uprising against them.

Accentuating this scenario, the New York Times reported on February 14, 2009, that the American military will begin recruiting immigrants who are living in this country with temporary visas, offering them the chance to become US citizens in as little as six months. These immigrants will have no loyalties to white American citizens and no concern for American freedoms AND they will be biased toward the all-powerful Jews.

Should Americans blame the Jews for the current economic crisis as 31% of Europeans now do? Some Americans are inclined to do so when pointing out that the loss of America’s manufacturing base due to offshoring of American jobs is a significant cause of the economic downturn. The Jewish-dominated garment industry, a leader in offshoring, is one of the most globalized industries existing today.

In recent years, Jewish-owned American chains such as The Gap, The Limited, Old Navy, Banana Republic, Tommy Hilfiger, and Reebok, have been purchasing from sweatshops located in China, East Asia, and Bangladesh. By the year 2000 at the turn of the century, over 60% of America’s clothing needs were imported from overseas.

The Jewish-dominated toy industry has also been outsourcing their toy-making since the 1990’s. Both the garment and toy industries, run mostly by Jews, have been among the first to outsource their products and thus began destroying America’s tax revenue base.

The dispossession of white Americans from their former spheres of influence in the work place, political affairs, and banking, (the Saving & Loans banks, now defunct, for instance), has been usurped by a small elitist group using the cover of Judaism to protect them from criticism of their affairs. To censure Jewry’s activities is to invite the wrath of the Jewish community upon oneself as being guilty of “persecuting” a “downtrodden” minority.

And this “downtrodden” minority, ironically, will not suffer any financial consequences while millions of dispossessed Americans line up on city streets in soup lines. Jews will still be driving their Cadillacs AND telling Americans that they’d better keep quiet or else…

For More See: The Slow Death Of Zionist America Click Here

And: How Zionist Jews Control America Click Here

And: 6 Stages Of America’s Decline Click Here

And: America’s Coming Civil Anguish Click Here

And: Federal Reserve: A Private Jew Bank Strangling America! Click Here

And: A Military Dictatorship Coming To America Click Here

By Ex-Jew Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2009

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=376

Europe Blames Jews for Financial Crisis

.