ADL Supremacist by its own definition

There has been a lot of debate about whether criticism about Israel and anti-Zionism crosses the line towards anti-semitism. The ADL, which is known as the premier organization to combat anti-semitism has declared that anti-Zionism is anti-semitism. They have set their own guidlines to determine what level of criticism of Israel is acceptable.

The ADL's national director Abe Foxman stated, "first, let me say anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. There should be no debate about that. After all, what is anti-Zionism but the denial of Jewish nationalism? Nothing made it clearer than when it came out in the UN's "Zionism is racism" resolution. It is pure, simple, unadulterated anti-Semitism. What it says is what is okay, what is permissible, what is laudatory, what is universally accepted for all peoples in the world - self-expression, self-determination, independence, sovereignty - is not permitted to Jews. That is what it says. It doesn't say Irish nationalism is racist or Congolese nationalism or French or Palestinian nationalism. It says Jewish nationalism is racist. That is pure and simple anti-Semitism."

While it is valid to say that those who deny Israel's right to exist are anti-semites, the ADL goes as far as to say those who deny its Jewish identity or call out the situation in the West Bank as Apartheid are anti-semitic. Foxman's point is that opposing Jewish nationalism is anti-Semitic because it denies the Jewish people the right to self determination.

Foxman says that the UN's declaration that Zionism is racism is anti-Semitic, however the UN in general is opposed to national sovereignty. Since the majority of the world has a negative view towards Israel and the US, the UN will reflect it. I am no supporter of the UN because I believe in national sovereignty and am opposed to international bodies dictating the policies of nation states, however the ADL is hypocritical about its stance since it opposes European Nationalism, and strongly criticizes any US politician that takes a strong stance on immigration, complains about demographic change, or talks about America having a Christian heritage, despite the fact that the ADL supports Israel's Government declaring the Nation as a Jewish State. More

Ex-ADL Leader Blasts ADL/Foxman

By Rev. Ted Pike

Joel Sprayregen is a former ACLU staff attorney and National Vice-Chair of the Anti-Defamation League. He was appalled at ADL's recent 27-page online attack on the Christian/conservative right, "Rage Grows in America: Anti-Government Conspiracies."
(http://www.adl.org/special_reports/rage-grows-in-America/default.asp)

Writing in American Thinker Online, November 29, he says, "You can...understand the consternation, and not just mine, which greeted the ADL's hyped "Report" declaring that 'rage' expressed against President Obama is un-American." He says, "ADL's perfervidly purple prose belies an abysmal ignorance of American political traditions." Sprayregen documents this tradition on the authority of Jefferson, Holmes, etc., who not only tolerated but actually encouraged fervent, even heated dissent.

"ADL's naked partisanship," he says, is revealed by the fact that "In the time of anti-Bush rage, the ADL held its tongue." But, he says, "You can't fool all the people all the timeThe failure of mainline media to scrutinize Obama and his mentors - which truly is unprecedentedincentivizes many who love this country to sound off...The ADL could not have chosen a more infelicitous moment to try to shield Obama from anger generated by his policies."

Sprayregen says he was National Vice-Chair of "the then-respected Anti-Defamation League." But in past years "ADL stumbled so egregiously. As observed by many, including myself, who have left the organization, the ADL has declined into an autocracy where no opinion counts other than that of its long-time National Director, Abraham Foxman, whom the New York Times described as "a one-man Sanhedrin for life." When Foxman hatches a crackpot idea like the "Rage Report," no one can restrain him."

He says, "Foxman is driven to justify his half-million-dollar-plus salary (matched in virtually no other Jewish organization) To generate publicity for himself, he launches (and then summarily drops) foolish initiatives, such as his attack on Christian Evangelicals, Israel's most consistent supporters I found only one press column praising the ADL statement: that of Los Angeles Times writer Timothy Rutten... When I googled Rutten, I found that last year, he received an ADL First Amendment award."

Sprayregen's article adds to rapidly mounting testimony by yet another Jew (and ADL insider) informing the world that ADL is a loose cannon on the deck of liberalism. It could threaten Zionist interests also because ADL is the PR bulldog of Israel to the world. Jewish liberals view it, as Jewish Week confirmed last week, as "an active part of the right-of-center pro-Israel establishment." Yet Foxman, Sprayregen contends, counterproductively attacks the century-long arch supporters of Israel: evangelical Christians. This includes WorldNetDaily owner Joseph Farah who, not unlike ADL, provides a pipeline for Israeli policy directives to millions of evangelicals.

Where Is ADL Taking Us?

What does Sprayregen's exposure of Foxman's instability and persecutive inclinations mean to Christians/conservatives -- indeed to all Americans?

It means many things because ADL has so profoundly altered American social attitudes, especially in regard to tolerance of homosexuality and support of pro-homosexual legislative initiatives. These, whether on the local, federal, or international level, will unfailingly be found to have been generated primarily by ADL and its parent organization, B'nai B'rith International.

ADL hate crimes laws have taken free speech from the citizens of Canada, England, Australia, etc.; and now America is shackled with a national hate law fully capable of doing the same. Recently signed by Pres. Obama, it was very largely conceived and brought into existence by the same Abe Foxman who wrote the recent "Rage Report" which portrays millions of Americans as "conspirators."

Since 1984, with publication of my book Israel: Our Duty, Our Dilemma, I have been sounding the alarm against the ADL -- warning of ADL's anti-Christian, anti-freedom malevolence -- just as Sprayregen and other Jewish ADL critics are now alleging. Yet virtual silence of any criticism of ADL has prevailed among frightened Christian and Jewish leaders until now. At last, Joseph Farah, Orthodox rabbi Nachum Shifren, Commentary magazine editor Jonathan Tobin, and Joel Sprayregen are finally breaking the national silence in terse and even biting rebuke. This is a historic moment. Never since its founding in 1913 have one evangelical and three Jewish leaders stood up in public criticism of ADL. Let's make sure that ADL's irresponsibility in issuing its "Rage Report" will result in a new era of responsibility for vigilance, scrutiny and criticism of ADL by all in positions of religious and political authority.

Danger from ADL Will Continue

What will happen to ADL if criticism and controversy over the "Rage Report" continues? Foxman could resign. ADL, under new leadership, could ostensibly learn some of the "tolerance" it has presumed to teach others for most of the past century.

Yet, ADL will remain an enormous threat to freedom. The statement by California Senator Jack Tenney in the 1971 Congressional Recordremains apropos: "The CIA and FBI are tinker toys compared to the ADL."

ADL remains frighteningly powerful, eliciting recent effusive praise from guest speakers at ADL functions: Janet Napolitano, head of the Department of Homeland Security; Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations; and Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General. In fact, legislative events of the past year have demonstrated beyond doubt that, at least concerning passage of ADL's hate crimes laws, most Democrats in Congress as well as Attorney General Holder are securely in the palm of ADL's hand.

ADL will continue to surveil Christian/conservative Americans along with fringe groups, providing under-the-table intelligence to the U.S. government unavailable through lawful means. Sometimes it will get caught, as Sprayregen says, "for illegally gathering evidence against unsuspecting Americansstored in its massive files (twice in recent years the ADL has paid damages for illegal surveillance)." (For a complete education on ADL's massive spy operation on 10,000 Americans, watch my gripping 82-minute video at www.truthtellers.org "Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians.")

Evil tends to be immoderate. This time ADL has gone too far. In 2005, ADL's National Executive Board member Philadelphia district attorney Lynne Abraham also went too far. Erupting in rage two days after Christian conservatives defeated ADL's hate bill in Congress, she took revenge on the religious right by arresting 11 Christians. She charged them with seven crimes, threatening 47 years in prison and $90,000 in fines each. Included was the "hate crime" of witnessing to homosexuals at a gay pride rally. But ADL paid a big price then, as I hope they will pay in the days and weeks ahead. As a result of Abraham's rash persecution, ADL provided a red hot issue which propelled me onto national talk radio. Since then, thanks to ADL, I have given roughly 700 interviews, with 125 hosts, almost entirely in warning against ADL and its hate laws.

Once, in an interview by author and radio talk show host Michael Collins Piper, he related how on a street corner in Washington, D.C. he saw someone who looked very familiar. Yes, it was Abe Foxman. Piper, who has exhaustively researched and written about ADL, started walking toward him, saying, "Hey, I know you -- you're Abe Foxman!" Foxman, doubtless recognizing Piper, turned and started walking briskly away and then fled.

This is the man who brings Christians/conservatives to silence and submission by threatening to label them anti-Semitic. He did this to Dr. Richard Land, President of the Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, several weeks ago. Land had transgressed ADL's ban on using any Nazi terminology to describe the pro-abortion provisions of the healthcare reform bill. Confronted by Foxman, Land was utterly intimidated, vowing, according to ADL, that from then on ADL can always count him "on board" their "tolerance" social agenda. Dr. Land should know this includes promotion of homosexuality, abortion, pornography, and hate laws. (See ADL Welcomes Christian Leader's Apology For Insensitive Remarks On Healthcare Debate)

Yet, as Piper's encounter reveals, Foxman showed himself a coward, one who can't face an eminent critic on the street corner or, as Sprayregen alleges, even criticism from his own staff. That is part of the reason he and ADL tirelessly promote hate laws which ban criticism of homosexuals, Muslims, and Jews. Above everything else, ADL abhors criticism of itself.

Foxman and the ADL need to be identified, exposed, and shamed in order to deflate their persona from the gargantuan proportions and reputation they have falsely attained over the past century. Foxman is like a phobia: If you run from it, it only attains credibility, becoming a giant in hot pursuit. But if you relax, turn around and mockingly defy it, it will dissipate. In the same way Foxman, the terror of the religious right, will shrink to nothing more than a mouse squeaking in the corner.

____________________

Let the Anti-Defamation League teach you how they have saddled 45 states with hate laws capable of persecuting Christians, and spearhead attempts to pass the federal hate crimes bill: http://www.adl.org/99hatecrime/intro.asp.

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.

The freedom-saving outreach of Rev. Ted Pike and the National Prayer Network is solely supported by sale of books, videos and your financial support. All gifts are tax-deductible.

ADL slams Honduras conspiracy theories

A Jewish civil rights organization is expressing alarm over conspiracy theories claiming Jews and Israel aided the ouster of the Honduran president and attempts to dislodge him from his refuge in the Brazilian Embassy.

The US-based Anti-Defamation League cited statements made by ousted President Manuel Zelaya as well as the news director of a radio station that was closed by the interim government in Honduras and by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, among others.

Most of the comments repeat widely circulated rumors that Israeli soldiers - or in some versions, mercenaries - worked with the troops backing interim President Roberto Micheletti, allegedly supplying some form of tear gas used at the embassy and providing other assistance.

The interim government, which came to power after the military arrested Zelaya and flew him to exile in Costa Rico on June 28, has denied receiving any Israeli help or using any tear gas at the embassy. Journalists who have covered the political crisis say they have not seen any sign of Israeli involvement. More

American Jewish Committee Won't Touch Hagee on Holocaust; Silence from AIPAC, ADL

In an interview today, an official from the American Jewish Committee would not criticize Pastor John Hagee for his explication, in a recently resurfaced sermon, of Hitler as a "hunter" sent by God to drive European Jews to Palestine.

Rabbi Gary Greenebaum, AJC's US Director of Interreligious Affairs, told me that he accepted Hagee's "clarification" of the sermon, which John McCain condemned as "crazy and unacceptable" last week. "I guess I feel like I don't really know how to understand that sermon. I guess I understand that he was trying to say that people can be an instrument of God's will, but in the throes of the passion of giving the sermon, perhaps he didn't stop and think what that meant," Greenebaum said. "But at least now, under reflection and under the current circumstances, he seems to be saying something very different. His statement of clarification I don't have much of a beef with as a free-standing statement."

But as the Huffington Post accurately reported last week, Hagee's clarification doesn't actually include an apology or a disavowal of the sermon. Here's the tape of the sermon at issue, in which Hagee also says that "They [the Jewish people] are physically alive but they're not spiritually alive."

Here's the question I set out to answer last week: would the most prominent Jewish and "pro-Israel" groups in the country finally take Hagee to task for his outrageous comments and for seeing Jews primarily in terms of their role in his eschatology?

The short answer is no. I submitted requests for comment about Hagee and his sermon to three organizations: the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. The first two groups closely monitor anti-Semitism and regularly issue statements decrying insensitivity to Jews by prominent figures like Hagee. As for AIPAC, Hagee had a prominent speaking role at its annual policy conference last year. And David Brog, executive director of Christians United for Israel, the organization of which Hagee is founder and national chairman, is slated to speak at AIPAC's 2008 policy conference next month.

Hagee's various anti-Semitic statements have actually been known for several years, as Max Blumenthal has reported. But given that the pastor's "Hitler was a hunter" tour de force is making national headlines and drawing criticism from a presumptive presidential nominee (and even some leaders in the Reform community), this seems like a perfect time for the ADL, AJC, and AIPAC to denounce Hagee, or, at the very least, his comments. The ADL and AIPAC, to my knowledge, have not commented on Hagee's sermon and they didn't respond to my requests.

Asked about Hagee's statement that Jews are "not spiritually alive," AJC's Greenebaum told me today: "I don't know what that means. The statements that I've read of his in recent times are actually very respectful of Jews, of the Jewish people, of Jewish religion. The question is, how do you get from there 10 years ago to where he is now. Is he that much of an evolving personality? Is his theology evolving? I don't know the answer to that question—I'd like to know." Asked whether he thought Hagee's statement was anti-Semitic, Greenebaum said: "Well, in 1998, or whenever he said whatever he said, I wasn't aware of him or his statement. I can only deal with the man as he is today. So if he wants to tell me that the refined statement or the clarification is what he believes, which is what he says he believes, how do I judge him otherwise, frankly, as a member of the clergy to a member of the clergy?"

The enduring lesson here is that you can say almost whatever you want about Jews or the Holocaust, as long as you're perceived as a supporter of Israel. As the ADL's Abe Foxman put it last year: "I think there is a role for [Pastor John Hagee]. He has earned a certain recognition with the community because of his support for Israel."

Mother Jones