The nature of the pro-Israel lobby’s influence on the American political system has been raised again this year by senatorial confirmation hearings, policy conferences, sequestration, and White House initiatives. This influence is typically attributed to
campaign contributions, but this view is unsophisticated. The power
of the pro-Israel lobby is, in fact, defined by the
dominance of various pro-Israel narratives in American culture.
The standard line that pro-Israel
sentiment is defined by dollar signs is easily refuted. The two largest
pro-Israel contributors—the America Israel Public Affairs Committee (
AIPAC) and
J-Street—together approximated $3.25 million in lobbying in 2012. While this sounds substantial, it’s a meager .09 percent of the total
$3.28 billion spent on overall political lobbying that year.
America’s
most tangible contribution to Israel is the annual $3 billion dollars
in military aid that Israel subsequently spends, largely
in the American defense sector. The biggest vested interests in these
expenditures are well-known, and their lobbying contributions many times
over exceed that of
pro-Israel organizations.
Boeing and
Lockheed Martin spent $15 million each on lobbying in 2012.
Israel receives more aid
per capita than any other country, but this cannot be accounted
for by the relatively small amount of money its advocates inject into
the American political system. The power of the various pro-Israel
narratives in the American political discourse is a far
more compelling explanation.
The “pro-Israel lobby” isn’t
a monolith; various groups have very different views and interact with
widely divergent constituencies.
Beginning
with the extreme right wing of the Jewish political spectrum, the
president of the right-wing Zionist Organization of America (
ZOA), Morton Klein, categorically
opposes a two-state solution and maintains that
Israel is not occupying any territory. Klein
implicitly questions the existence of Palestinians by
insisting on reducing their identity to Arabs only and suggesting they
relocate to “Arab States.” Because of their extreme views, the ZOA’s
influence is very limited with respect to the White House and the
Senate; however they do have
friends in the House of Representatives.
Another narrative propelling right-wing American support for Israel is promoted
by some evangelical Christian groups. Commonly referred to as “
Christian Zionism,” this perspective emphasizes a prophetic role attributed to Israel. This might seem
friendly on the surface, but it derives from evangelical eschatology best demonstrated by the wildly popular
Left Behind novels. As
the Anti-Defamation League notes,
this narrative entails “the annihilation of Jews…who refuse to convert
at Armageddon.” Evangelicals use Israel to promote their yearning for
Armageddon rather than for a safe and prosperous Jewish state. Many
Israelis and Jewish-American groups prefer to overlook these problematic
beliefs as these Evangelicals have huge constituencies in the American
electorate.
Mainstream Jewish proponents of Israel such as AIPAC tend to stress alliance and solidarity with the United States. First,
these groups argue that Israel
is the only democracy in an autocratic Middle East, despite Israel’s
decades-long military occupation and the regional developments of the
Arab Spring. Second, they argue Israel has shared values with the United
States in terms of women’s rights, gay rights, and minority rights,
without acknowledging
discrimination against Palestinians. While they admit Israel must make concessions to achieve peace,
they argue that Israel
has already made many concessions and Palestinian intransigence is the
main obstacle to peace. Moreover these groups are typically uncritical
of Israeli policies, and generally support Israel’s leadership.
Further
to the left are the self-defined “pro-Israel, pro-peace” groups like
Americans for Peace Now and J-Street. These groups argue on Israel’s
behalf, but assert that given the history and current state of the
conflict, being pro-Israel also inherently means being pro-Palestinian
and supporting the creation of a Palestinian state. While these groups
have certainly experienced growth in recent years, their efforts to
transform American conceptions of the conflict remain a work in
progress.
Most
importantly, there are deeply ingrained aspects of mainstream American
culture into which pro-Israel narratives can, and do, tap. Consider
AIPAC's presentation of Israel’s "
Quest for Statehood":
A religious minority facing European persecution believing “that
they would only escape discrimination… in a state of their own” resolves
to take up an arduous journey to a faraway, allegedly
“sparsely populated” land. For many Americans this account of Israel’s
national mythology is deeply reminiscent of their own. There is an
unmistakable kinship between the Israeli and American national
narratives that combine pioneer spirit with spiritual redemption of
sanctified land.
From
its outset, the American national consciousness drew extensively on
Biblical analogies for legitimation. Americans conceptualized Manifest
Destiny with images of rugged adventurers claiming a divine heritage
from one ocean to the other. African-Americans relied on Biblical
imagery and analogies in their own quest for emancipation and then for
civil rights. Israel and its supporters are keenly aware of this
cultural legacy and seldom miss an opportunity to reinforce the deeply
rooted parallels in the mythologies informing the American and Israeli
national projects.
However
there is no shortage of legitimate narratives to be found in
the Israel-Palestinian conflict. A more informed and constructive
American national conversation about the Middle East will remain
impossible so long as only one set of narratives is available.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/02/the-pro-israel-lobby-narratives-not-money.html
No comments:
Post a Comment