So the Beltway world is a-twitter (literally) with the rumor
that President Obama will nominate former Senator Chuck Hagel (R-Neb) to be the
next secretary of defense. This is a
smart move that will gladden the hearts of sensible centrists, because Hagel is
a principled, intelligent and patriotic American who believes that U.S. foreign
and defense policy should serve the national interest. Here are my top five reasons why Hagel
would be an excellent choice for the job.
1: He's a Republican
realist. Like former defense
secretary Robert Gates, Hagel is a realist from the moderate wing of the
Republican party. He's a staunch advocate
of a strong defense, yet he's clearly opposed to squandering U.S. power,
prestige, and wealth on misbegotten crusades.
He's also not prone to threat-inflation, which makes him almost
unique.
Hagel's candidacy is also something of a no-lose appointment
for Obama. By nominating a well-known
Republican, Obama can again demonstrate a genuine commitment to bipartisanship. And if Republican senators try to torpedo
the nomination of one of their own, it merely underscores how petty, extreme,
and out of touch they are. Either way, Obama wins.
2: He thinks for himself. Unlike the usual inside-the-Beltway
careerists with jelly for vertebrae and weathervanes for a conscience, Hagel is
an independent thinker who wasn't afraid to challenge his own party when it started
heading off the rails under President George W. Bush.
Hagel showed real courage when he said that the Bush administration was
the "most arrogant and incompetent administration"; he was telling it like it
was. Washington could use more plain
speaking these days, especially where foreign and defense policy are concerned. That's
what Obama liked about Gates, and that's what he would get with Hagel.
3: He knows the subject. Hagel is a decorated Army veteran who earned
two Purple Hearts in Vietnam, and he's remained involved with defense matters
throughout his public career. More
importantly, he's also well-versed on intelligence issues, having served on the
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the President's Intelligence
Advisory Board (PFIAB). In an era where
DoD and the intelligence community increasingly intersect, that's a valuable
pedigree. And if his personal
experience in war has made him less inclined to intervene than eager civilians
with no military experience, so much the better.
4: He's got good judgment. Although Hagel erred in voting for the
Iraq War resolution in 2002, he figured out the war was a blunder a lot faster
than most of his colleagues did. He wisely
opposed the "surge" in 2006, and called instead for an immediate U.S.
withdrawal. In terms of U.S. interests, getting out
earlier would have saved us tens of billions of dollars and hundreds of soldiers'
lives, and it would produced essentially the same outcome we have today. Remember: we stuck around long enough to
cement Nuri al-Maliki's hold on power, only to watch him align his country
with Iran, tell us to leave, and then obstruct our efforts in Syria. With the benefit of hindsight, Hagel's
judgment looks sound.
5: He's got the
right enemies. Hagel does have one
political liability: Unlike almost all of his former colleagues on Capitol
Hill, he hasn't been a complete doormat for the Israel lobby. In the summer of 2006, for example, he
incurred the lobby's wrath by calling for a joint ceasefire during Israel's war
with Hezbollah. Pressed by the lobby,
Bush & Co. rejected this advice and let the war drag on, even though
prolonging it made Hezbollah more popular in Lebanon and cost additional
Israeli lives. Hagel has also been
outspoken in calling for the United States to be more evenhanded in its
handling of the peace process, and he's generally thought to be skeptical about
the use of military force against Iran.
Needless to say, such positions are anathema to Israel's hard-line
supporters, some of whom are already attacking Hagel's suitability for
SecDef. For the rest of us, however, Hagel's
views are not only sensible -- they are in America and Israel's best interest.
Having lost out on Susan Rice, Obama is unlikely to put forward a
nominee he's not willing to fight for or whom he thinks he might lose. So if Hagel is his pick to run the Pentagon,
you can bet Obama will go to the mattresses for him. And what better way for Obama to pay back
Benjamin Netanyahu for all the "cooperation" Obama received from him during the
first term, as well as Bibi's transparent attempt to tip the scale for Romney
last fall?
For what it's worth, I hope Obama nominates Hagel and that
AIPAC and its allies go all-out to oppose him.
If they lose, it might convince Obama to be less fearful of the lobby
and encourage him to do what he thinks is best for the country (and incidentally,
better for Israel) instead of toeing AIPAC's line. But if the lobby takes Hagel down, it will
provide even more evidence of its power, and the extent to which supine support
for Israel has become a litmus test for high office in America.
Of course, it hard to know how effective a manager of the
sprawling Pentagon bureaucracy Hagel would be. But he would inherit a seasoned
team of deputies to help him handle the day-to-day administrative tasks, and he
certainly knows how the sausage gets made in Washington. Obama reportedly has confidence in Hagel's
judgment, and could rely on him both for sage advice and political cover when
needed. It is therefore easy to see why
the president might find him an appealing pick. Equally important, he'd be an excellent choice for our country, which
has a crying need for effective and principled leaders.
http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/12/13/top_five_reasons_obama_should_pick_chuck_hagel_for_secdef
Friday 14 December 2012
Top five reasons Obama should pick Chuck Hagel for SecDef
Posted @ 09:09
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment