Tuesday, 17 June 2008

Wake Up America. Your Government is Hijacked by Zionism

HTML clipboard
Israelis Use Pentagon To Plan Iran Bombing

HTML clipboard

Project CHECKMATE Could Create Ten Times More Horrors

Project CHECKMATE is a "highly confidential strategic planning group tasked with 'fighting the next war' as tensions rise with Iran" that was "quietly established" by the U.S. Air Force in June 2007 as a "successor to the group that planned the 1991 Gulf War's air campaign," Sarah Baxter reported September 23, 2007, in Rupert Murdoch's Times of London.[1]

CHECKMATE is led by Brigadier-General Lawrence A. Stutzriem, Director, Chief of Staff of the Air Force Strategic Studies Group - CHECKMATE,[2] "considered one of the brightest" U.S. Air Force generals.[1] Stutzriem was a "senior officer" in the Coalition Air Operations Center based in Saudi Arabia[3][4] "that ran the Afghanistan air campaign."[5]

CHECKMATE "consists of 20-30 top air force officers and defence and cyberspace experts with ready access to the White House, the CIA and other intelligence agencies". Stutzriem, who is assisted by Dr. Lani Kass, a "former Israeli military officer and expert on cyberwarfare", reports directly to General Michael Moseley, chief of the Air Force. According to Defense sources, "[d]etailed contingency planning for a possible attack on Iran has been carried out for more than two years" by U.S. Central Command, Baxter wrote.[1] ... More

Secret US air force team to perfect plan for Iran strike

THE United States Air Force has set up a highly confidential strategic planning group tasked with “fighting the next war” as tensions rise with Iran.

Project Checkmate, a successor to the group that planned the 1991 Gulf War’s air campaign, was quietly reestablished at the Pentagon in June.

It reports directly to General Michael Moseley, the US Air Force chief, and consists of 20-30 top air force officers and defence and cyberspace experts with ready access to the White House, the CIA and other intelligence agencies.

Detailed contingency planning for a possible attack on Iran has been carried out for more than two years by Centcom (US central command), according to defence sources.

Checkmate’s job is to add a dash of brilliance to Air Force thinking by countering the military’s tendency to “fight the last war” and by providing innovative strategies for warfighting and assessing future needs for air, space and cyberwarfare.

It is led by Brigadier-General Lawrence “Stutz” Stutzriem, who is considered one of the brightest air force generals. He is assisted by Dr Lani Kass, a former Israeli military officer and expert on cyberwarfare.

The failure of United Nations sanctions to curtail Iran’s nuclear ambitions, which Tehran claims are peaceful, is giving rise to an intense debate about the likelihood of military strikes.

Bernard Kouchner, the French foreign minister, said last week that it was “necessary to prepare for the worst . . . and the worst is war”. He later qualified his remarks, saying he wanted to avoid that outcome.

France has joined America in pushing for a tough third sanctions resolution against Iran at the UN security council but is meeting strong resistance from China and Russia. Britain has been doing its best to bridge the gap, but it is increasingly likely that new sanctions will be implemented by a US-led “coalition of the willing”.

Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who arrives in New York for the United Nations general assembly today, has been forced to abandon plans to visit ground zero, where the World Trade Center stood until the September 11 attacks of 2001. Politicians from President George W Bush to Senator Hillary Clinton, the Democratic frontrunner in the 2008 race for the White House, were outraged by the prospect of a visit to New York’s most venerated site by a “state sponsor” of terrorism.

Bush still hopes to isolate Iran diplomatically, but believes the regime is moving steadily closer to obtaining nuclear weapons while the security council bickers.

The US president faces strong opposition to military action, however, within his own joint chiefs of staff. “None of them think it is a good idea, but they will do it if they are told to,” said a senior defence source.

General John Abizaid, the former Centcom commander, said last week: “Every effort should be made to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, but failing that, the world could live with a nuclear-armed Iran.”

Critics fear Abizaid has lost sight of Iran’s potential to arm militant groups such as Hezbollah with nuclear weapons. “You can deter Iran, but there is no strategy against nuclear terrorism,” said the retired air force Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney of the Iran policy committee.

“There is no question that we can take out Iran. The problem is the follow-on, the velvet revolution that needs to be created so the Iranian people know it’s not aimed at them, but at the Iranian regime.”

Checkmate’s freethinking mission is “to provide planning inputs to warfighters that are strategically, operationally and tactically sound, logistically supportable and politically feasible”. Its remit is not specific to one country, according to defence sources, but its forward planning is thought relevant to any future air war against Iranian nuclear and military sites. It is also looking at possible threats from China and North Korea.

Checkmate was formed in the 1970s to counter Soviet threats but fell into disuse in the 1980s. It was revived under Colonel John Warden and was responsible for drawing up plans for the crushing air blitz against Saddam Hussein at the opening of the first Gulf war.

Warden told The Sunday Times: “When Saddam invaded Kuwait, we had access to unlimited numbers of people with expertise, including all the intelligence agencies, and were able to be significantly more agile than Centcom.”

He believes that Checkmate’s role is to develop the necessary expertise so that “if somebody says Iran, it says: ‘here is what you need to think about’. Here are the objectives, here are the risks, here is what it will cost, here are the numbers of planes we will lose, here is how the war is going to end and here is what the peace will look like”.

Warden added: “The Centcoms of this world are executional – they don’t have the staff, the expertise or the responsibility to do the thinking that is needed before a country makes the decision to go to war. War planning is not just about bombs, airplanes and sailing boats.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article2512097.ece

Project Checkmate plots next Iran move

THE US Air Force has set up a highly confidential strategic planning group given the task of "fighting the next war" as tensions rise with Iran.

Project Checkmate, a successor to the group that planned the 1991 Gulf War's air campaign, was quietly re-established at the Pentagon in June. It reports directly to US Air Force chief General Michael Moseley and consists of 20-30 top air force officers and defence and cyberspace experts with ready access to the White House, the CIA and other intelligence agencies.

Detailed contingency planning for a possible attack on Iran has been carried out for more than two years by Centcom (US Central Command), according to defence sources.

Checkmate's job is to add some brilliance to air force thinking by countering the military's tendency to "fight the last war" and by providing innovative strategies and assessing future needs for air, space and cyberwarfare.

It is led by Brigadier General Lawrence "Stutz" Stutzriem, who is considered one of the brightest air force generals. He is assisted by Lani Kass, a former Israeli military officer and expert on cyberwarfare. The Australian

More here:

Cheney Tries to "Checkmate" the Joint Chiefs on Iran

HTML clipboard

War with Iran real risk according to former CIA operative
U.S. Getting Ready for War with Iran
President Bush intends to attack Iran in coming months
Project Checkmate: Israeli planning bombing of Iran..
John McCain’s Chilling Project for America
Walt, Mearsheimer go to Israel
Rice to press Israelis on settlements
Bill Presses Iraq To Recognize Israel
Jewish Supremacist Mukasey defies Supreme Court
Israeli hawks pushing for strikes on Iran
A virtual declaration of war against Iran
Bush 'all options are on the table' for Iran
Bush doesn't rule out military strike in Iran
We Want Bush Impeached, We Support the Kucinich Resolution.
Obama Capitulates to the Israel Lobby
Make No Mistake: McCain's a Neocon
Call-in day to tell members of Congress to stop Iran war
President Carter: America must do what Israel says
The Spy Who Loves Us - Pay no mind to the Mossad agent on th
US/IRAN: Fearing Escalation, Pentagon Fought Cheney
The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in th
Ron Paul: Nancy Pelosi pulled Iran bill on orders of Israel
'Washington Times'-Identifies Pro-Israel Agenda for Iraq War
LIKE FATHER LIKE SON. THE COVER-UP CONTINUES ON USS LIBERTY
Neocons Perle, Feith, Libby and others pushed for Iraq war


1 comment:

Ojalanpoika said...

Jeru-salaam, -shalom & -salem,

Could you kindly comment, whether my details are correct in a dissident essay concerning the recent scaling up of production in the Israeli high Tech companies in:
http://www.helsinki.fi/~pjojala/Expelled-Jews-statistics.htm ?

However, if you are only after Jihad against Eretz Israel by the means of media war after the conventional weapons were not succesful, please do not bother. I don't want to have anything to do with any holy war - wars are not holy. No matter if they are won or lost.

E.g. "...It is United States that profits from Israel, rather than the opposite. Israel got some 120 million € in 2007, but open brain drain is its prerequisite. Astonishing number of 25% of the Israeli researchers have moved to the United States - and this figure does not yet include the people with double citizenship. The next largest drain of researchers are 12.2% from Canada, 4.3% from Netherlands, and 4.2% from Italy.

The population of Arabs under the Israeli government increased ten-fold in only 57 years. Palestinian life expectancy increased from 48 to 72 years in 1967-95. The death rate decreased by over 2/3 in 1970-90 and the Israeli medical campaigns decreased the child death rate from a level of 60 per 1000 in 1968 to 15 per 1000 in 2000 at the Westbank. (An analogous figure was 64 in Iraq, 40 in Egypt, 23 in Jordan, and 22 in Syria in 2000). During 1967-88 the amount of comprehensive schoold and second level polytechnic institutes for the Arabs was increased by 35%. During 1970-86 the proportion of Palestinian women at the West Bank and Gaza not having gone to school decreased from 67 % to 32 %. The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in West Bank and Gaza increased in 1968-1991 from 165 US dollars to 1715 dollars (compare with 1630$ in Turkey, 1440$ in Tunis, 1050$ in Jordan, 800$ in Syria, 600$ in Egypt. and 400$ in Yemen).

Before the Second Intifada, there were nearly 200 Israeli companies listed in the Nasdaq, at the Intifada the count dropped to 70. (The number is still greater than from all the European countries combined). It is said that the dollars are green since the Americans pull them down from the tree raw and fresh. The start-ups are imported straight from the garage, and scaling up of production in the "conflict hotspot" has been considered impossible. But the new Millennium has brought a change in tide.

As an example, the supranational Intel transferred the mass production of Centricon-processors to Israel, where ~20% of citizens possess university decrees (ranking 3rd in the world) but where the environment respects patents and are not plagiating every item they produce to others like the rocketting China. Intel was also offered an overall tax rate of 10%, which is about three times lower than that of US.

Recovering from hemorrhage in the left hemisphere of the brain,
Pauli Ojala, evolutionary critic
Biochemist, drop-out (MSci-Master of Sciing)
Helsinki, Finland
http://www.helsinki.fi/~pjojala/Dinoglyfs.htm