Gandhi’s grandson blasts Israel, Jews

I think NOT… but, needless to say, the zionist leadership disagrees with me. The following quotes were made regarding recent Blog entries written by Arun Gandhi, the grandson of the late legendary leader of India…..

For Dr. Efraim Zuroff, the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Israel director, Arun Gandhi’s thoughts on “Jewish identity” are “exceptionally strange, especially in light of the fact that there’s never been any history of anti-Semitism in India and among Hindus.”

According to Zuroff, the notion that Jewish identity is “locked into” the Holocaust and causes resentment, coupled with the statement that “Israel and the Jews are the biggest players” in a “culture of violence [that] is eventually going to destroy humanity,” clearly amount to anti-Semitism.

The following is the Blog entry made by Arun Gandhi in the Washington Post earlier this week….

It is followed by a response published in the Jerusalem Post over the weekend.

Arun Gandhi

President and co-founder of the M.K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence.

Born in 1934 in Durban, South Africa, Arun Gandhi is the fifth grandson of India’s legendary leader, Mohandas K. “Mahatma” Gandhi. He is president and co-founder of the M. K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence, now at the University of Rochester in New York. He is a regular participant in Renaissance Weekend deliberations with President Clinton and other Rhodes Scholars. He worked for 30 years as a journalist for The Times of India. He is the author of several books, including “A Patch of White” (1949) and “The Forgotten Woman: The Untold Story of Kastur, the Wife of Mahatma Gandhi,” which he wrote with his late wife Sunanda.

Jewish Identity Can’t Depend on Violence

Jewish identity in the past has been locked into the holocaust experience — a German burden that the Jews have not been able to shed. It is a very good example of a community can overplay a historic experience to the point that it begins to repulse friends. The holocaust was the result of the warped mind of an individual who was able to influence his followers into doing something dreadful. But, it seems to me the Jews today not only want the Germans to feel guilty but the whole world must regret what happened to the Jews. The world did feel sorry for the episode but when an individual or a nation refuses to forgive and move on the regret turns into anger.The Jewish identity in the future appears bleak. Any nation that remains anchored to the past is unable to move ahead and, especially a nation that believes its survival can only be ensured by weapons and bombs. In Tel Aviv in 2004 I had the opportunity to speak to some Members of Parliament and Peace activists all of whom argued that the wall and the military build-up was necessary to protect the nation and the people. In other words, I asked, you believe that you can create a snake pit — with many deadly snakes in it — and expect to live in the pit secure and alive? What do you mean? they countered. Well, with your superior weapons and armaments and your attitude towards your neighbors would it not be right to say that you are creating a snake pit? How can anyone live peacefully in such an atmosphere? Would it not be better to befriend those who hate you? Can you not reach out and share your technological advancement with your neighbors and build a relationship?Apparently, in the modern world, so determined to live by the bomb, this is an alien concept. You don’t befriend anyone, you dominate them. We have created a culture of violence (Israel and the Jews are the biggest players) and that Culture of Violence is eventually going to destroy humanity.

Source

The following is from the Weekend Edition of the Jerusalem Post…

A grandson of the late Indian leader Mohandas Gandhi has penned some thoughts on Jewish identity that were published this week on the Washington Post’s Web site.

“Jewish identity in the past has been locked into the Holocaust experience,” wrote Arun Gandhi, who heads the M.K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence at the University of Rochester in New York. “It is a very good example of [how] a community can overplay a historic experience to the point that it begins to repulse friends.”

According to Gandhi, “The world did feel sorry for the episode [the Holocaust,] but when an individual or a nation refuses to forgive and move on, the regret turns into anger.”

Gandhi is pessimistic about the future of Jewish identity, which “appears bleak” because “any nation that remains anchored to the past is unable to move ahead, and especially a nation that believes its survival can only be ensured by weapons and bombs.”

In the blog entry, posted to the Washington Post’s On Faith blog on Monday and titled “Jewish Identity Can’t Depend on Violence,” Gandhi wonders whether Israelis would not be better served “to befriend those who hate you” rather than turning Israel into “a snake pit” through “your attitude toward your neighbors.”

“Apparently, in the modern world, so determined to live by the bomb, this is an alien concept,” he wrote, concluding: “You don’t befriend anyone, you dominate them. We have created a culture of violence (Israel and the Jews are the biggest players) and that culture of violence is eventually going to destroy humanity.”

The blog posting is followed by an apology posted on Thursday.

“I am writing to correct some regrettable misimpressions I have given in my comments on my blog this week. While I stand behind my criticisms of the use of violence by recent Israeli governments - and I have criticized the governments of the US, India and China in much the same way - I want to correct statements that I made with insufficient care, and that have inflicted unnecessary hurt and caused anger,” he wrote.

Gandhi insists he does “not believe and should not have implied that the policies of the Israeli government are reflective of the views of all Jewish people,” but affirms that “when a people hold on to historic grievances too firmly it can lead to bitterness and the loss of support from those who would be friends.”

Nonetheless, he concludes, “The suffering of the Jewish people, particularly in the Holocaust, was historic in its proportions.”

For Dr. Efraim Zuroff, the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Israel director, Arun Gandhi’s thoughts on “Jewish identity” are “exceptionally strange, especially in light of the fact that there’s never been any history of anti-Semitism in India and among Hindus.”

According to Zuroff, the notion that Jewish identity is “locked into” the Holocaust and causes resentment, coupled with the statement that “Israel and the Jews are the biggest players” in a “culture of violence [that] is eventually going to destroy humanity,” clearly amount to anti-Semitism.

Furthermore, Gandhi’s words reflect his grandfather’s misunderstanding of the Jewish situation, Zuroff said.

“Sometimes people become obsessed with their own agenda to the extent that they think it’s the solution to every problem,” he said. “Even the great Mohandas Gandhi did not have a monopoly on wisdom, and the best proof of that was his suggestion that Jews engage in passive resistance against the Nazis. It’s an absurd response in the face of absolute totalitarianism and a movement like Nazism. It’s like saying the Indian army should disband and let the Taliban and al-Qaida and the Pakistanis overrun the country.”

Arun Gandhi’s comments “obviously show his distinct lack of ability to analyze history. With all due respect to his lineage and the wonderful idea he represents, this is an outrageous statement that does no credit to him, his family or his institution,” Zuroff said.

The original blog post garnered more than 500 responses, many expressing support for what they understood as Gandhi’s anti-Zionist statements.

Gandhi is not new to controversy regarding Israel. During a visit to Israel in 2004 he called on tens of thousands of Palestinians in Jordan to march across the Jordan River and enter Israel in a nonviolent protest.

He also reportedly said at the time that the Palestinians’ situation was “10 times worse” than that of blacks under South Africa’s apartheid regime.

Have we reached a point where Israel cannot in any way be criticised? Does the special status they seem to want as a nation include the condemnation of all opinions against their policies?

It seems so, but hopefully it will be Israel that changes, thereby changing the opinions as well.

THIS is also worth looking at.

LF